• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Residency

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Residency"

Collapse

  • Platypus
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    I don't understand why they did not do something like this:

    "Peter Green pays 40% tax from any dividends paid out to his wife regardless of her residence".
    It would be funny is she ever filed for divorce, she would claim these UK retail giants as belonging solely to her. I'm sure he wouldn't mutter a word of objection. Ha!

    Leave a comment:


  • tim123
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    I don't understand why they didn't do something like:
    "the residence rules will be changed so that any day when a person spends more than 30 seconds in the UK establishes UK residence for that year, the year before and the following year.
    This means that residents cannot opt out of paying their fair contribution by saying they are not resident in the UK;
    Oh, like the rule they have in Germany you mean?

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    I don't understand why they did not do something like this:

    "Peter Green pays 40% tax from any dividends paid out to his wife regardless of her residence".

    Cos he wouldn't donate to Nu Labour, and go and live somewhere else.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    I don't understand why they didn't do something like:
    I don't understand why they did not do something like this:

    "Peter Green pays 40% tax from any dividends paid out to his wife regardless of her residence".

    Leave a comment:


  • Spacecadet
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    Tough on logic, tough on the causes of logic.

    Quote of the day

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    I don't understand why they didn't do something like:

    the residence rules will be changed so that any day when a person spends more than 30 seconds in the UK establishes UK residence for that year, the year before and the following year.
    This means that residents cannot opt out of paying their fair contribution by saying
    they are not resident in the UK;

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    It's got the word fair in it, so it can't be wrong?

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    started a topic Residency

    Residency

    Used to be day of arrival and departure didn't count. Now it's the number of "midnights", so effectively day of arrival now counts.

    I like this bit

    the residence rules will be changed so that any day when a person
    spends midnight in the UK counts towards establishing UK residence.
    This means that residents cannot opt out of paying their fair contribution by saying
    they are not resident in the UK;
    But before the change, residents couldn't "opt of paying their fair contribution by saying they are not resident" either.

    Tough on logic, tough on the causes of logic.

Working...
X