Reply to: Chef: 'I Had Sex With Sally Anne's Body'

[Mr Crosby]

Hang him.

[KathyWoolfe]

I can't comprehend how someone could happen across someone lying on the ground unconscious and start bonking them. For that reason the guy's either lying or a nutter. Either way better off off of our streets.

She was even lying in a pool of blood, so how could he not realise that she at least needed to get medical attention?

This guy is real sick and should be locked away - preferebly for life in an asylum.

[PAH]

I can't comprehend how someone could happen across someone lying on the ground unconscious and start bonking them. For that reason the guy's either lying or a nutter. Either way better off off of our streets.

[VectraMan]

I read he claimed not to know that she was dead/dying, in which case he's basically admitting rape, which is going to be a pretty big sentence anyway.

[chef]

tell me about it, got caught doing 63 in a 40, not heard back from the initial reply of "yes it was me in the car, yes i did it".. 3mph below the definate court date so we'll see..

i can prove i never killed SA, 1 as she has posted since then and 2, i've been in biiirmingham for a while working.. there, done

[EternalOptimist]

that is the best, most surreal report ive ever read...

i can assure you guys that I have not had sex with SA's body, where is she by the way? and that i have merely been busy working at a clients site in Burrrmingham..

scarily, i was reading it thinking, i didnt do that, my name isnt mark dixie, they have the wrong person...

Well I think you did it. The onus is on you to prove you didnt do it. The Poilice are too busy running speed cameras and sitting in the canteen to check out what really happened

[xoggoth]

Waste not want not, me old pop useta say.

Seriously, the real problem is not so much the perversity of bonking a corpse, after all if she really was dead, what difference would it have made? but the casual attitude to someone else's welfare. If he really discovered somebody in that state then every second to get help was vital.

Even if he was not guilty of the actual attack a sane law should treat it as murder anyway. As for the drink and drugs, the time has long passed when either should be a defence against anything. There is a time when everyone is undrugged and sober and it should be considered that they take full responsibility if they voluntarily choose to enter any other state.

I have no experience of drugs beyond a bit of weed in yoof but as far as alcohol is concerned the claim that one is not responsible, even at the time, is bollox anyway. One never looses a sense of responsibility if one ever had it in the first place.

[chef]

that is the best, most surreal report ive ever read...

i can assure you guys that I have not had sex with SA's body, where is she by the way? and that i have merely been busy working at a clients site in Burrrmingham..

scarily, i was reading it thinking, i didnt do that, my name isnt mark dixie, they have the wrong person...

[PAH]

Where is Chef anyway?

Polishing off his chocolate salty balls.

[beaker]

Where is Chef anyway?

[zathras]

http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/...304109,00.html

lummee, these multi-tab browsers can confuse you if you're not careful and forget which website you're on!

Is n't necrophillia illegal in this country?

[oracleslave]

How in heaven's name does this guy think that he will get away with this? - unless he's trying for a plea of "not guilty by reason of diminished responsibility"

If guilty I hope to ***k he doesn't get a reduced sentence cause of some diminished responsibility loophole crap.

[SallyAnne]

[Bumfluff]

Some real sick people in this world

[Alf W]

Hardly OJ Simpson's legal defence team is it? My money's on a recent grad cutting his Legal Aid teeth on a cannon fodder case.