- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Google!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Google!"
Collapse
-
Some of the users here have the same issue today- but I'm in Berkshire. We've got some offices in Geordieland though
-
Originally posted by SallyAnne View PostOh I can't be arsed.
Sorry, you're lovely really
Leave a comment:
-
I think that's because when you say "carp", you're being generic, whereas with "trud", you're singleing out an individual log which is not fair.Originally posted by TimberWolf View PostAnd I thought trud (allowed and intentionally misspelled) worse than saying carp.Last edited by Pinto; 15 January 2008, 16:53.
Leave a comment:
-
And I thought trud (allowed and intentionally misspelled) worse than saying carp.
Leave a comment:
-
Got to say that I have been surprised that norks, crap and tulip are considered rude on here, but nobody cares about pi**....Originally posted by ferret View Post
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/10...login_shocker/
Is minge really swearing. Well porks with an n at the start probably isn't either really so guess I am on thin ice with this one...
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SallyAnne View Post
I unhighlighted it, like a good girl
(Have to have 1 thread today that I'm not hated in!!)
Which thread would that be then SA?
Leave a comment:
-
I couldn't agree more - nporks certainly isn't swearing.Originally posted by ferret View Post
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/10...login_shocker/
Is minge really swearing. Well porks with an n at the start probably isn't either really so guess I am on thin ice with this one...
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ferret View Post
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/10...login_shocker/
Is minge really swearing. Well porks with an n at the start probably isn't either really so guess I am on thin ice with this one...
I unhighlighted it, like a good girl
(Have to have 1 thread today that I'm not hated in!!)
Leave a comment:
-

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/10...login_shocker/
Is minge really swearing. Well porks with an n at the start probably isn't either really so guess I am on thin ice with this one...
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ferret View PostIs there to stop some software that requests lots of info from Google to try and work out Google ranks sites like it does or to find sites to link to etc. If your web department has all web requests going through on IP address then it can cause a trigger in Google that gives you that error page to make sure it is a human making the request and not an automated process.
Saw a funny one on The Register or somewhere once where a Google captcha on the page like the one you sent spelled out minge. They had obviously not used a UK profanity filter
Mods!!! Mods!!!! Look what ferret said!!!!
Oh, wait...
Last edited by SallyAnne; 15 January 2008, 15:24.
Leave a comment:
-
I had that happen to me once. Then it just stopped. Not sure why.Originally posted by SallyAnne View PostWierd - it must be something on site here.
Whenever I try I get this
http://www.google.co.uk/sorry/?conti....google.co.uk/
Never had that before!!
Leave a comment:
-
Is there to stop some software that requests lots of info from Google to try and work out Google ranks sites like it does or to find sites to link to etc. If your web department has all web requests going through one IP address then it can cause a trigger in Google that gives you that error page to make sure it is a human making the request and not an automated process.
Saw a funny one on The Register or somewhere once where a Google captcha on the page like the one you sent spelled out "minge". They had obviously not used a UK profanity filter
Leave a comment:
-
Wierd - it must be something on site here.
Whenever I try I get this
http://www.google.co.uk/sorry/?conti....google.co.uk/
Never had that before!!
Leave a comment:
-
It's a poor imitation of SKA as far as I know.
Seems to be working fine though.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Luke’s Story: “I knew it was a loan. But they changed the rules.” Today 00:00
- I registered my company with my home address. Whoops. Here's what Companies House shows the world about you Yesterday 13:06
- The Tories’ three IR35 replacement options — but contractors are right to be sceptical Yesterday 03:51
- Conservatives to replace IR35 outright, Griffith vows — advisers who met him reveal what it should contain Sep 21 05:06
- HMRC’s tax calculation errors: why contractors must check their bill now Sep 17 05:14
- HMRC names 12 loan charge-type schemes, one with ‘Tardis’ clause Sep 15 00:12
- Inside IR35 contractors as zero-hours reform victims is why Kate Dearden must meet us Sep 14 06:37
- Simple Assessment letters: How ex-Personal Service Companies are on HMRC’s radar Sep 11 12:16
- HMRC leaves 37,000 contractors’ nil-liability question in the air Sep 11 07:42
- Pay 2% to protect a ‘loan’. Settle it for 1–2%? The contractor debt mystery deepens Sep 10 06:30

Leave a comment: