Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Inheritance Tax - What have you done to avoid it?"
24% is exempt through being in a pension, and another 52% is exempt because it would go to the wife under the rules of intestacy. (I believe money left to wife does not count for inheritance tax purposes.)
I'm slightly confused by the last bit of that. Whilst assets which go to a spouse are exempt this means (at least meant before the changes) that all that would effectively happen is that it would still be part of her estate on her death (unless she'd spent it). Thus the only impact was to effectively defer the tax until the second death.
Just done a calculation, for myself alone and 300K limit. I think only 24% of my net worth would be potentially subject to inheritance tax, and that takes me well below 300K
24% is exempt through being in a pension, and another 52% is exempt because it would go to the wife under the rules of intestacy. (I believe money left to wife does not count for inheritance tax purposes.)
The bit that is potentially caught would go to my parents and brother and sister, but as I said, is well below the limit.
Edit: this link shows how the taxable amount is much smaller than the estate, if you're married. Note that the limits are well out-of-date. These days I believe the spouse gets the first 200K plus half the rest. The tax-free amount is also much higher.
I think it's now a 600K limit between two, if you're married.
Firstly, money that's inside a pension scheme should be safe. If you've notified the pension who you would like your pot to go to, but it's at their discretion, that means it will be outside your estate for inheritance tax.
Currently the wife and I are over the limit even after deducting pensions, but not by much.
I intend to spend the money by buying an annuity. No matter how much money you have, you can eliminate it from your estate overnight by doing this, while continuing to benefit from it by getting an income for the rest of your life. The only problem with this strategy is that your income may force you to spend more than you're comfortable with in order to ensure capital doesn't accumulate again. I think this as a challenge most of use would rise to though.
Last edited by IR35 Avoider; 5 January 2008, 11:05.
The zero band for IHT is £300K and that includes all your property, cars, possesions, savings etc. I would have thought most here have assets way above this level.
See poll.
I'm leaving all my possessions to TPD.
Kind of like when a crazy women leaves money to her cats.
Leave a comment: