• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "UBS just posted $10 billion writedown"

Collapse

  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Bigger danger now is deflation - any deflation and there will be a depression.
    The only deflation that may happen is that of house prices or any other overvalued assets. Other things (especially food) will go up in price. I suspect that central banks will accept higher inflation rather than recession - politically motivated of course.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by wendigo100 View Post
    I agree. And raising them at the same time to fight off inflation.
    Is there going to be much inflation? Bigger danger now is deflation - any deflation and there will be a depression.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by Chantho View Post
    I would guess that they won't, but they could if they needed and it wouldn't cost them any more than e.g. the Iraq war.
    War in Iraq has got deferred and spread costs - there is no single $500 bln hit, plus money go into production that keeps jobs and GDP up, military have got big budget anyway.

    Leave a comment:


  • wendigo100
    replied
    Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
    Flip! 1929 all over again?

    Plan B - shoeshine boy.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bright Spark
    replied
    Add another $4bn hit from Societe Generale.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7136308.stm

    Leave a comment:


  • wendigo100
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    I still think cutting interest rates will save us.
    I agree. And raising them at the same time to fight off inflation.

    Leave a comment:


  • Platypus
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    I still think cutting interest rates will save us.
    I think it's likely to put off the inevitable sharp decrease in house prices and bankruptcies until GB loses the election, then NewLab can blame the Tories while maintaining their "unblemished" economic record

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    I still think cutting interest rates will save us.

    Leave a comment:


  • BlasterBates
    replied
    Originally posted by wendigo100 View Post
    Does anyone else get the feeling that this time we really are sliding into something horrible?
    The really horrible thing we're sliding into.

    Leave a comment:


  • Platypus
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    It's just a start. People have not started defaulting on their morgages to have banks take over their houses to put on market, and then big drops in house values - all this will make banks write off many more billions. Sub-prime market in the USA, apparently, is over $1 trln, imagine the write down if house prices drop 50%...
    This could be very amusing to watch from the sidelines.

    I wonder if house prices do drop significantly in the UK what effect this will really have other than on Daily Express readers, e.g. if your house was worth £200k five years ago, now worth say £400k, but drops back to £300k, you're still up on the deal.

    Leave a comment:


  • Chantho
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Do you think USA will bail out their (very likely foreign actually) banks to the tune of $500 bln?
    I would guess that they won't, but they could if they needed and it wouldn't cost them any more than e.g. the Iraq war.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dow Jones
    replied
    Blah-blah-blah

    1 zillion trillion is b*ll*x. The truth is: WE DON'T KNOW - UBS has had more exposure in the securitized mortgages as they have different processes when assessing risk from someome like Nationwide BS. More risks = more rewards in that market. Generally, banks are playing the odds, however, unlike black-jack or roulette gamblers, the risk is pre-assessed and 99% they will only lose what they can afford to, in UBS case this is more than most. Don't panic.

    Leave a comment:


  • lilelvis2000
    replied
    The same banks to which the government owes money to? perhaps a bit of you scratch mine and I'll scratch yours!

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by Chantho View Post
    $500 billion is about 10 x Northern Rock investment by British Government, not very much for a nation like the US.
    Do you think USA will bail out their (very likely foreign actually) banks to the tune of $500 bln?

    Leave a comment:


  • Chantho
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    It's just a start. People have not started defaulting on their morgages to have banks take over their houses to put on market, and then big drops in house values - all this will make banks write off many more billions. Sub-prime market in the USA, apparently, is over $1 trln, imagine the write down if house prices drop 50%...
    $500 billion is about 10 x Northern Rock investment by British Government, not very much for a nation like the US.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X