• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Government ePassports uncrackable"

Collapse

  • BrowneIssue
    replied
    Originally posted by wendigo100 View Post
    The government would never be lax with personal data.
    No, but they do Ex-lax our personal data.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dow Jones
    replied
    Beware Bungling Bureaucrats

    Does the Passport Office still send the new passports by normal post (small brown envelope)? Fancy charging £ 80 or so and not sending them by registered post!!
    Last time, I insisted on collecting my daughter's from the Petty France Office in London. I got some funny looks by the idiots there, couldn't believe I was so security-conscious.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by tim123 View Post
    I'm sorry, but I don't buy into this need to keep all my data secure in order to stop someone pretending to be me.
    Exactly. Biometrics are not secrets. They are akin to a pin number stuck to one's head and scattered to the four winds as you pass by. The problem, already identified by someone earlier (perhaps even you), is that people do not know that biometrics are not secrets (this includes the general public and politicians) but treat them as such. This can lead to an insecure system if businesses use biometrics in place of secrets, as often touted by politics.

    Leave a comment:


  • tim123
    replied
    Originally posted by Moscow Mule View Post
    The biometric data will also be stored - so that's your fingerprints, iris scan and face-shape patterns. .
    Currently all that is a digital picture. Well there's a real one in the book that someone can digitize if they want.

    Originally posted by Moscow Mule View Post
    If it's readable from a distance and crackable -
    The solution to this is easy. Make sure that it is stored (and read) in a faraday cage.

    Originally posted by Moscow Mule View Post
    both have been proved in (I think) the German or Dutch trials - then any old tom/dick/harry can get pretty much all they need to spoof your life.
    As they can by reading the thing. I'm sorry, but I don't buy into this need to keep all my data secure in order to stop someone pretending to be me. The details that they need to do this are in the public domain somewhere. Shreading my mail does not stop them getting it. If it's possible to steal my identity by knowing my current address (on the electoral register), place and date of birth (available from the register of Births) then there aren't sufficient checks in place when the interloper uses that data. Asking me to make it only very slightly harder for him to obtain my details, is like having tissue paper doors on your house to stop someone breaking in.

    Originally posted by Moscow Mule View Post
    If the data is held centrally, then that data is also open to abuse from a disgruntled/dishonest employee. There is also a plan to sell this data - a la DVLA data to car-clampers.

    There is a real chance of your personal data being in the public domain if this is allowed to go ahead.
    It already is.

    tim

    Leave a comment:


  • wendigo100
    replied
    Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
    The real danger is that people think "oh, it's secure..." and the government spins it so that the majority think it's secure. When that happens, people get lax about keeping the data safe, and it's open season for fraudsters.
    The government would never be lax with personal data.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheFaQQer
    replied
    Originally posted by Moscow Mule View Post
    The biometric data will also be stored - so that's your fingerprints, iris scan and face-shape patterns.

    If it's readable from a distance and crackable - both have been proved in (I think) the German or Dutch trials - then any old tom/dick/harry can get pretty much all they need to spoof your life.

    If the data is held centrally, then that data is also open to abuse from a disgruntled/dishonest employee. There is also a plan to sell this data - a la DVLA data to car-clampers.

    There is a real chance of your personal data being in the public domain if this is allowed to go ahead.
    The real danger is that people think "oh, it's secure..." and the government spins it so that the majority think it's secure. When that happens, people get lax about keeping the data safe, and it's open season for fraudsters.

    Plan B in the making, methinks.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by Moscow Mule View Post
    The biometric data will also be stored - so that's your fingerprints, iris scan and face-shape patterns.

    If it's readable from a distance and crackable - both have been proved in (I think) the German or Dutch trials - then any old tom/dick/harry can get pretty much all they need to spoof your life.

    If the data is held centrally, then that data is also open to abuse from a disgruntled/dishonest employee. There is also a plan to sell this data - a la DVLA data to car-clampers.

    There is a real chance of your personal data being in the public domain if this is allowed to go ahead.
    Looking on the bright side, one could not only claim to be Spartacus, but could prove it too.

    Leave a comment:


  • Moscow Mule
    replied
    Originally posted by tim123 View Post
    Given that it only contains details that are available in the passport in a printed form, why is this a problem exactly?

    I can see that it's an issue if someone can write forged details back, but I can see no issue at all with someone being able to crack the reading part.

    tim
    The biometric data will also be stored - so that's your fingerprints, iris scan and face-shape patterns.

    If it's readable from a distance and crackable - both have been proved in (I think) the German or Dutch trials - then any old tom/dick/harry can get pretty much all they need to spoof your life.

    If the data is held centrally, then that data is also open to abuse from a disgruntled/dishonest employee. There is also a plan to sell this data - a la DVLA data to car-clampers.

    There is a real chance of your personal data being in the public domain if this is allowed to go ahead.

    Leave a comment:


  • PRC1964
    replied
    Originally posted by tim123 View Post
    Because the man in the customs office of: middle of nowhere's ville, bongo bongo land is not going to have a connection to that database.

    tim
    They do now. Someone sent them a couple of CDs...

    Leave a comment:


  • tim123
    replied
    Government ePassports uncrackable

    Originally posted by threaded View Post
    Bwahahahahaha.
    Given that it only contains details that are available in the passport in a printed form, why is this a problem exactly?

    I can see that it's an issue if someone can write forged details back, but I can see no issue at all with someone being able to crack the reading part.

    tim

    Leave a comment:


  • tim123
    replied
    Originally posted by b0redom View Post
    I don't understand why the chip doesn't just contain a serial number, and when you pass through passport control, that's used to do an RMI lookup to a secure DB.

    It would be nigh on impossible to forge a passport as the border guys would be able to see what the passport should look like?

    :
    Because the man in the customs office of: middle of nowhere's ville, bongo bongo land is not going to have a connection to that database.

    tim

    Leave a comment:


  • wendigo100
    replied
    Originally posted by b0redom View Post
    I don't understand why the chip doesn't just contain a serial number, and when you pass through passport control, that's used to do an RMI lookup to a secure DB.

    It would be nigh on impossible to forge a passport as the border guys would be able to see what the passport should look like?

    :
    Unless you are a giant alien lizard disguised as a human. Or a grey disguised as a grey shark...

    Leave a comment:


  • b0redom
    replied
    I don't understand why the chip doesn't just contain a serial number, and when you pass through passport control, that's used to do an RMI lookup to a secure DB.

    It would be nigh on impossible to forge a passport as the border guys would be able to see what the passport should look like?

    :

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by BrowneIssue View Post
    Seems to me that abroad is full of foreigners anyway.
    How can it be?

    I thought London was full of foreigners!!! You can't have two places full, somewhere must be empty...

    Leave a comment:


  • BrowneIssue
    replied
    Originally posted by Moscow Mule View Post
    Back to the old folks home for you Grandad. Don't think you'll be needing your passport again.
    Seems to me that abroad is full of foreigners anyway.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X