Suggested material for Adof fans
Maybe something by David Irving or Nick Griffin perhaps??
Seriously though (apart from the excellent 'Downfall' DVD):
'Fatherland' by Richard Harris - also 'Archangel' for Josef (Stalin) fans by the same author.
Both highly recommended.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Hitler Book
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Hitler Book"
Collapse
-
Keaton was in quite a close shot all the time - and moving slightly so if they used a double then it was an extremely good one.Originally posted by rootsnall View PostI would of gone for using a dummy for the frames in which the house is actually falling.
Leave a comment:
-
I would of gone for using a dummy for the frames in which the house is actually falling.Originally posted by zeitghostThe trickery in the house thing being carefully measuring where the window would be...
Leave a comment:
-
Being short helps too.Originally posted by KathyWoolfe View PostTrigonometry would help here.
Leave a comment:
-
Trigonometry would help here.Originally posted by zeitghostThe trickery in the house thing being carefully measuring where the window would be...
All you have to do is ask the nearest trigonom
Leave a comment:
-
The film mentioned with the clock face that falls away from the wall employed a little trickery, directly underneath the clock face was a platform to catch said actor if anything went wrong. It was the camera angle that made it look spectacular(for those days...).Originally posted by rootsnall View PostIt was all a myth !
To be honest I know bog all about it but I suspect the 'do their own stunts' was part of the publicity when selling the film at the time. If you were Keaton or Lloyd and running a business ( a real one ! ) why risk your neck needlessly if you could employ a bit of trickery instead.
Keaton and Lloyd were involved in the early days of motion pictures. They developed many of the techniques used in later films.
Leave a comment:
-
It was all a myth !Originally posted by Moose423956 View PostI think the most amazing thing was how they used to do their own stunts. Like the Keaton one where the house falls down and he's not hurt because he "goes through" an open window. Or Harold Lloyd hanging from a clockface. No CGI involved there.
Now someone will tell me it was all a myth.
To be honest I know bog all about it but I suspect the 'do their own stunts' was part of the publicity when selling the film at the time. If you were Keaton or Lloyd and running a business ( a real one ! ) why risk your neck needlessly if you could employ a bit of trickery instead.
Leave a comment:
-
Some of his more spectacular stunts - IMO - occured in his film "The General" where a lot of the action takes place on moving steam trains. To say that they were remarkable for that time is an understatement.Originally posted by Moose423956 View PostI think the most amazing thing was how they used to do their own stunts. Like the Keaton one where the house falls down and he's not hurt because he "goes through" an open window. Or Harold Lloyd hanging from a clockface. No CGI involved there.
Now someone will tell me it was all a myth.
Leave a comment:
-
I think the most amazing thing was how they used to do their own stunts. Like the Keaton one where the house falls down and he's not hurt because he "goes through" an open window. Or Harold Lloyd hanging from a clockface. No CGI involved there.Originally posted by KathyWoolfe View PostI think that Chaplin's films are quite entertaining but for that era in the history of film I prefer watching Buster Keaton. his antics and deadpan expression are priceless.
Now someone will tell me it was all a myth.
Leave a comment:
-
I think that Chaplin's films are quite entertaining but for that era in the history of film I prefer watching Buster Keaton. his antics and deadpan expression are priceless.Originally posted by Ruprect View PostI find his films about as funny as getting an arrow through the neck and discovering there's a gas bill tied to it.
Leave a comment:
-
I second The Great Dictator*. There's also a Don Delillo novel about a filmstrip of Hitler in his bunker doing a Charlie Chaplin impression - can't remember which one it is, maybe Mao II or Running Dog
"Hitler-Stalin: Parallel Lives" is a legendary & readable hatchet-job too.
*the Chaplin film, not the actual dictator.
Leave a comment:
-
There's no accounting for taste. I bet you hate the Marx Brothers as well.Originally posted by Ruprect View PostI find his films about as funny as getting an arrow through the neck and discovering there's a gas bill tied to it.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Leave a comment: