• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Freedom of speach

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Freedom of speach"

Collapse

  • wendigo100
    replied
    I thought the protesters were acting a bit Nazi-like. They'll be burning books next...

    Leave a comment:


  • TheFaQQer
    replied
    Originally posted by shaunbhoy View Post
    Don't you oppress me you Nazi!!
    Racist!

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    No problem with freedom of speech, so long as that freedom is not used to do evil.

    Evil according to my definition, naturally.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mailman
    replied
    Originally posted by KathyWoolfe View Post
    You cannot now protest within 1 mile of Parliament or Downing Street
    This is a lie, you can protest within 1 mile of Parliament and Downing Street...its just that you have to get permission first.

    Remember, you have no rights...merely privileges handed to you by the Courts and the Government of the day

    Mailman

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
    I don't think the thread was anything about CUK, more a reference to the Oxford Union debate / non-debate this week.
    Don't you oppress me you Nazi!!

    Leave a comment:


  • TheFaQQer
    replied
    Originally posted by shaunbhoy View Post
    No restrictions. Start reining back on people that talk Kobblers and we might as well shut this place down. And then what would the hard-core of resident billy-no-mates muppets do? Molesting squirrels and Passat Polishing?
    I don't think the thread was anything about CUK, more a reference to the Oxford Union debate / non-debate this week.

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by KathyWoolfe View Post
    The muslim with only hooks for hands (I forget his name) is being deported to the USA for "suspicion of terrorism" despite only having advocated violence against non-muslims.

    That's terrible! Can't we just stone him here instead?

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by KathyWoolfe View Post
    The muslim with only hooks for hands (I forget his name) .
    Captain Hook, with Tony Blair as Peter Pan

    Leave a comment:


  • KathyWoolfe
    replied
    Originally posted by shaunbhoy View Post
    No restrictions. Start reining back on people that talk Kobblers and we might as well shut this place down.
    You cannot now protest within 1 mile of Parliament or Downing Street

    The muslim with only hooks for hands (I forget his name) is being deported to the USA for "suspicion of terrorism" despite only having advocated violence against non-muslims.

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by John Galt View Post
    Should free speach cover those whose views you find abhorrent or should we just restrict to those that the PC lovies find acceptable?

    Discuss
    No restrictions. Start reining back on people that talk Kobblers and we might as well shut this place down. And then what would the hard-core of resident billy-no-mates muppets do? Molesting squirrels and Passat Polishing?

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
    "free speech includes not only the inoffensive but the irritating, the contentious, the eccentric, the heretical, the unwelcome and the provocative provided it does not tend to provoke violence. Freedom only to speak inoffensively is not worth having." -- Lord Justice Sedley, Redmond-Bate v BPP 1999

    That's why we let sasguru spout bollox.

    Leave a comment:


  • KathyWoolfe
    replied
    Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
    "free speech includes not only the inoffensive but the irritating, the contentious, the eccentric, the heretical, the unwelcome and the provocative provided it does not tend to provoke violence. Freedom only to speak inoffensively is not worth having." -- Lord Justice Sedley, Redmond-Bate v BPP 1999

    What he said

    Leave a comment:


  • TheFaQQer
    replied
    "free speech includes not only the inoffensive but the irritating, the contentious, the eccentric, the heretical, the unwelcome and the provocative provided it does not tend to provoke violence. Freedom only to speak inoffensively is not worth having." -- Lord Justice Sedley, Redmond-Bate v BPP 1999

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    You have a speach impediment?

    Leave a comment:


  • John Galt
    started a topic Freedom of speach

    Freedom of speach

    Should free speach cover those whose views you find abhorrent or should we just restrict to those that the PC lovies find acceptable?

    Discuss

Working...
X