- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Cheque please- finally you can rely on a cheque"
Collapse
-
Considering that half the time it is the banks that cock up, this is a good thing. one more inch towards the 21st century for the banks.
-
The banks won't lose money on this one. They'll simply increase their charges/lower interest.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostSurely the key bit is that you were a victim of fraud rather than a knowing party to it? If the cheque clears and then proves fraudulent, as long as you are the victim, then you should still be fine.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SueEllen View PostDimPrawn is wrong again and TonyEnglish's thoughts are right.
If you go to the apacs pages about this http://www.apacs.org.uk/07_11_26.html - there is a little asterisk at the end of the press release stating:
"Unless they are a knowing party to a fraud"
So if the banks think the cheque is fraudenlent you don't get your money. So being cynical if the cheque bounces you are going to have to fight with the bank to get your money.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SueEllen View PostDimPrawn is wrong again and TonyEnglish's thoughts are right.
If you go to the apacs pages about this http://www.apacs.org.uk/07_11_26.html - there is a little asterisk at the end of the press release stating:
"Unless they are a knowing party to a fraud"
So if the banks think the cheque is fraudenlent you don't get your money. So being cynical if the cheque bounces you are going to have to fight with the bank to get your money.
Leave a comment:
-
DimPrawn is wrong again and TonyEnglish's thoughts are right.
If you go to the apacs pages about this http://www.apacs.org.uk/07_11_26.html - there is a little asterisk at the end of the press release stating:
"Unless they are a knowing party to a fraud"
So if the banks think the cheque is fraudenlent you don't get your money. So being cynical if the cheque bounces you are going to have to fight with the bank to get your money.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by PerlOfWisdom View PostWhat's a Bank Manager?
Leave a comment:
-
I thought there were some well known scams out there where the banks protected themselves based on this aspect of cheques. The ones where a person agrees to cash a cheque and split it X to the sender and Y for himself. Then the original cheque is stopped leaving the person who cashes the cheque out of pocket. If the cheque value can no longer be withdrawn, surely this would leave the banks open to this type of scam.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Swiss Tony View PostYou open a company called the Ar*e Tickler's Fagg*t Fan Club.
You take an advert in the back page of some gay mag, advertising the latest in arse-intruding dildos, sell it a bit with, er... I dunno, "does what no other dildo can do until now", latest and greatest in sexual technology. Guaranteed results or money back, all that bollocks.
These dills cost twenty-five each; a snip for all the pleasure they are going to give the recipients.
They send a cheque to the company name, nothing offensive, er, Bobbie's Bits or something, for twenty-five. You put these in the bank for two weeks and let them clear.
Now this is the clever bit. Then you send back the cheques for twenty-five pounds from the real company name, Ar*e Tickler's Fagg*t Fan Club, saying sorry, we couldn't get the supply from America, they have sold out.
Now you see how many of the people cash those cheques; not a single soul, because who wants his bank manager to know he tickles arses when he is not paying in cheques!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Swiss Tony View PostYou open a company called the Ar*e Tickler's Fagg*t Fan Club.
You take an advert in the back page of some gay mag, advertising the latest in arse-intruding dildos, sell it a bit with, er... I dunno, "does what no other dildo can do until now", latest and greatest in sexual technology. Guaranteed results or money back, all that bollocks.
These dills cost twenty-five each; a snip for all the pleasure they are going to give the recipients.
They send a cheque to the company name, nothing offensive, er, Bobbie's Bits or something, for twenty-five. You put these in the bank for two weeks and let them clear.
Now this is the clever bit. Then you send back the cheques for twenty-five pounds from the real company name, Ar*e Tickler's Fagg*t Fan Club, saying sorry, we couldn't get the supply from America, they have sold out.
Now you see how many of the people cash those cheques; not a single soul, because who wants his bank manager to know he tickles arses when he is not paying in cheques!
Leave a comment:
-
Plan B
You open a company called the Ar*e Tickler's Fagg*t Fan Club.
You take an advert in the back page of some gay mag, advertising the latest in arse-intruding dildos, sell it a bit with, er... I dunno, "does what no other dildo can do until now", latest and greatest in sexual technology. Guaranteed results or money back, all that bollocks.
These dills cost twenty-five each; a snip for all the pleasure they are going to give the recipients.
They send a cheque to the company name, nothing offensive, er, Bobbie's Bits or something, for twenty-five. You put these in the bank for two weeks and let them clear.
Now this is the clever bit. Then you send back the cheques for twenty-five pounds from the real company name, Ar*e Tickler's Fagg*t Fan Club, saying sorry, we couldn't get the supply from America, they have sold out.
Now you see how many of the people cash those cheques; not a single soul, because who wants his bank manager to know he tickles arses when he is not paying in cheques!
Leave a comment:
-
For that very reason.
You can accept a cheque, give the product or service and 1 week, 1 month, 1 year, 5 years down the line the bank can take the money back. Cheques NEVER fully clear. Ever.
But that's going to change.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Five tax return mistakes contractors will make any day now… Jan 9 09:27
- Experts you can trust to deliver UK and global solutions tailored to your needs! Jan 8 15:10
- Business & Personal Protection for Contractors Jan 8 13:58
- ‘Four interest rate cuts in 2025’ not echoed by contractor advisers Jan 8 08:24
- ‘Why Should We Hire You?’ How to answer as an IT contractor Jan 7 09:30
- Even IT contractors connect with 'New Year, New Job.' But… Jan 6 09:28
- Which IT contractor skills will be top five in 2025? Jan 2 09:08
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
Leave a comment: