• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Snow and Climate Change (Global "Warming")"

Collapse

  • NotAllThere
    replied
    If the earth is warming up, then there will be more energy in the atmosphere, and weather will get more unpredictable. This may result in more severe winters than expected or much milder winters than expected.

    What's stupid is that the GW mob jump on one year's bad ski season as evidence of global warming. Even if they're right, one year's data means nothing. If, over a ten year period, ski seasons have been gradually getting shorter and higher, then, maybe, that can be used as evidence.

    A nuclear winter would be pointless. I want to ski when it's sunny. Why can't we have decent snowfalls in summer? Bring back snowball earth.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mailman
    replied
    http://things.auditblogs.com/2007/11...-propaganda-1/

    ATW, explain your way out of this one?

    Mailman

    Leave a comment:


  • The Master
    replied
    Originally posted by Mailman View Post
    If the weather was predictable then that Fish guy wouldnt have got it so wrong 20 years ago!

    Or is the reason he got that so wrong because of climate change back then?
    Or as he pointed out on the retrospective the other day, they always cut the clip off just after he says "I'd just like to reassure Mrs B Smegma that there is no hurricane on the way..." [which there wasn't] "...but it is going to be extremely stormy in the south-east tonight".

    Leave a comment:


  • The Master
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    The key here is that "abundance", ie lots more than in normal times - climate is being screwed up, in one year too hot, in another too cold - if things go this way there might be 30 years too hot no snow, and 5 years with lots of snow.
    Hang on a mo, if one year it is too cold and the next it is too hot, then surely on the average everything is fine?

    Nothing to worry about then!

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Yes before climate change the weather was always sunny and exactly 21 deg C across the whole globe.

    We never had floods, droughts, storms, tidal surges, rain, heat, snow, tornados, hurricanes back then.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mailman
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    I did.

    Dim is acting dumb today. Global Warming already leads to harsher less predictable weather, it is silly to say that just because there is now more snow than last year then there is no global warming - the point is that already climate is less predictable and if nothing is done matters will be worse.
    You toss...its the weather...weather by its very nature is fairly unpredictable!
    If the weather was predictable then that Fish guy wouldnt have got it so wrong 20 years ago!

    Or is the reason he got that so wrong because of climate change back then?

    Mailman

    Leave a comment:


  • Mailman
    replied
    I can only base my opinions on climate change based on personal recordings going back to 2003.

    Last year the snow arrived both earlier and finished later than the great snow dumps of 2005 and 2004 here in London.

    Climate change...its just another name for "tax em up the arse!"

    Mailman

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by wendigo100 View Post
    No you didn't.

    It was the partially light-hearted point that last year's lack of snow was singularly used by some as proof of global warming, so begging the question, why cannot this year's abundance of snow be singularly used to prove the opposite?

    Go to top of the class.

    Leave a comment:


  • Addanc
    replied
    Try this spoon fed version.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by wendigo100 View Post
    I give up...

    Leave a comment:


  • wendigo100
    replied
    I give up...

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by wendigo100 View Post
    why cannot this year's abundance of snow be singularly used to prove the opposite?
    The key here is that "abundance", ie lots more than in normal times - climate is being screwed up, in one year too hot, in another too cold - if things go this way there might be 30 years too hot no snow, and 5 years with lots of snow.

    Leave a comment:


  • wendigo100
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    I did.

    Dim is acting dumb today. Global Warming already leads to harsher less predictable weather, it is silly to say that just because there is now more snow than last year then there is no global warming - the point is that already climate is less predictable and if nothing is done matters will be worse.

    So what's good will it be to have good snow once a decade? The eco-system in Alps will be screwed up and every company there will go bust waiting for once in a decade snow.
    No you didn't.

    It was the partially light-hearted point that last year's lack of snow was singularly used by some as proof of global warming, so begging the question, why cannot this year's abundance of snow be singularly used to prove the opposite?

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    I did.

    Dim is acting dumb today. Global Warming already leads to harsher less predictable weather, it is silly to say that just because there is now more snow than last year then there is no global warming - the point is that already climate is less predictable and if nothing is done matters will be worse.

    So what's good will it be to have good snow once a decade? The eco-system in Alps will be screwed up and every company there will go bust waiting for once in a decade snow.
    Another drone follows the hype....

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by wendigo100 View Post
    I'm not sure you've grasped the point there, Alexei...
    I did.

    Dim is acting dumb today. Global Warming already leads to harsher less predictable weather, it is silly to say that just because there is now more snow than last year then there is no global warming - the point is that already climate is less predictable and if nothing is done matters will be worse.

    So what's good will it be to have good snow once a decade? The eco-system in Alps will be screwed up and every company there will go bust waiting for once in a decade snow.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X