• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Musharraf is not a dictator"

Collapse

  • wendigo100
    replied
    Worrying times. Those radicals are like a virulent disease...

    Leave a comment:


  • Bright Spark
    replied
    a more scarier thought is radical mullahs (al qaeda) in pakistan, dismantling a nuke
    and loading the warhead on a commercial airliner and detonating this
    over downtown new york or central london, would make 9/11 look like
    a walk in the park .

    Leave a comment:


  • gingerjedi
    replied
    Scary thought but if either Pakistan or Iran fired a nuke in anger at India or Israel would they be left to fight their own battles or do you think the US just wouldn't be able to resist? Especially as they do have a bit of a track record with this sort of thing and they must have a procedure in place to deal with this scenario.

    Leave a comment:


  • lilelvis2000
    replied
    Originally posted by Bright Spark View Post
    At least the nukes are safe in mush's hands, if so called democracy
    comes to pakistan it would only be short term, the main threat
    is the country being taken over by radical islamic mullahs,
    nobody really wants them to have their greasy hands over the nuclear button.

    True. Islamists do not understand the concept of "deterrent". They will use it at the slightest twitch.

    Leave a comment:


  • lilelvis2000
    replied
    Imran Khan was arrested today with the help the radical Islamist students who forced him into a van and drove him to the cops. Great country eh?
    Musharraf knows well that the political parties will never work together - particularily the Islamist and secular parties.

    No one knows what Mush is up to. one second he's putting down radicals - the next he's making deals with them. One thing for sure - there is no reason to go around incarcerating people who are against the radicals!

    Leave a comment:


  • Bright Spark
    replied
    At least the nukes are safe in mush's hands, if so called democracy
    comes to pakistan it would only be short term, the main threat
    is the country being taken over by radical islamic mullahs,
    nobody really wants them to have their greasy hands over the nuclear button.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pondlife
    replied
    Can't remember where I read it but think it's an apt summary.
    Musharraf is less popular in the country he rules that the terrorist he is being paid billions of dollars to find.
    If he stays, there will be blood on the streets and a far more extremist regime will take over IMHO.

    Leave a comment:


  • Gordon Brown
    replied
    Do they want a couple of Blairs? Surplus to requirements.

    Yours,

    Gordon.

    Leave a comment:


  • gingerjedi
    replied
    Originally posted by Spacecadet View Post
    Problem in Pakistan at the moment is the islamist militants
    Musharraf is just about keeping them in check
    If he were to step down now the country would in all likelyhood implode in civil war
    I agree, this is the only time I have ever thought that democracy may not be the best thing, I find myself agreeing with Musharraf when he says the stability of the country is more important than democracy no matter how unpalatable it may seem... carpy situation.

    Leave a comment:


  • PRC1964
    replied
    Originally posted by Moose423956 View Post
    That's odd, because he's behaving like one.

    Linky
    Musharraf was a dictator when he took power in a coup.

    Then he ceased being a dictator when we needed his help in Afghanistan.

    Now that things look like going tits up for him, he is a dictator again and we will all get pally with Benazir Bhutto.

    Bhutto will cock the country up for a couple of years before being arrested for corruption again.

    HTH

    Leave a comment:


  • Spacecadet
    replied
    Problem in Pakistan at the moment is the islamist militants
    Musharraf is just about keeping them in check
    If he were to step down now the country would in all likelyhood implode in civil war

    Leave a comment:


  • TheFaQQer
    replied
    "The day when there is no turmoil in Pakistan, I will step down."
    And on that day, Satan will be going to work on a snow plough.

    Leave a comment:


  • Moose423956
    started a topic Musharraf is not a dictator

    Musharraf is not a dictator

    That's odd, because he's behaving like one.

    Linky

Working...
X