The park worker probably wasnt trying to bring death and destruction to the taleban...which in todays "tratorious" society means he should get more.
Although, seeing as that geezer is supposedly one of the most badly hurt to survive the Afghan conflict I wonder what it would have taken to get the whole amount awardable, instead of half the amount he got?
Mailman
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Bloke sacked gets £550,000 compensation
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Bloke sacked gets £550,000 compensation"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by KathyWoolfe View Post
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by DimPrawn View Posthttp://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7074251.stm
A sacked London park worker has been awarded record compensation of £550,000 because he was the victim of disability discrimination.
The man, who suffers learning difficulties, was unfairly sacked from his job by Lambeth Serviceteam, an employment tribunal in Croydon found.
Seems rather a lot for a bloke losing his job as a park worker? Compare that to the compensation someone gets for losing a hand, leg or being wheelchair bound due to war or an accident.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/s...re/6966684.stm
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SueEllen View PostTo teach public service employers to stop wasting loads of taxpayers money fighting cases they can't win and to settle out of court. I know the Met Police and a few Hospital Trusts waste loads of money on these sorts of cases as well.
It must be good being a law firm for these idiots as you get a continual income stream.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Sockpuppet View PostIts excessive.
Why the heck do judges feel the need to give out these large sums to people. Yeah the dude lost his job. He's not a rocket scientist lets face it.
It must be good being a law firm for these idiots as you get a continual income stream.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Sockpuppet View Post£550,000 for losing his job. Hell they should have just called the police they'd have shot him for a cool £175,000.
I agree it is ridiculous, the comparisons of compensation for something relatively trivial to someone dying or loosing limbs because of lack of body armour etc...
Leave a comment:
-
Its excessive.
Why the heck do judges feel the need to give out these large sums to people. Yeah the dude lost his job. He's not a rocket scientist lets face it.
£550,000 for losing his job. Hell they should have just called the police they'd have shot him for a cool £175,000.
Leave a comment:
-
Bloke sacked gets £550,000 compensation
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7074251.stm
A sacked London park worker has been awarded record compensation of £550,000 because he was the victim of disability discrimination.
The man, who suffers learning difficulties, was unfairly sacked from his job by Lambeth Serviceteam, an employment tribunal in Croydon found.
Seems rather a lot for a bloke losing his job as a park worker? Compare that to the compensation someone gets for losing a hand, leg or being wheelchair bound due to war or an accident.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Which IT contractor skills will be top five in 2025? Jan 2 09:08
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
Leave a comment: