Reply to: CUK Shrine

[TheFaQQer]

Who was this guy?

old_kebab
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 4

c'mon own up.

Not me - I saw that he came and went, and didn't see why. I'd guess DBA Bloke, but not I.

[TheFaQQer]

there is a place for that and it is called test please delete.

Sadly, it seems that General seems to be a forum for irrelevant threads these days. Maybe General and LR should be renamed "Clean Irrelevant Posts" and "Not Clean Irrelevant Posts".

[Pondlife]

Who was this guy?

old_kebab
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 4

c'mon own up.

[TheFaQQer]

I don't know the whole story

Well, that's never stopped anyone on CUK before, so let's see where we go with this one...

but my feeling is CUK forum is not the gutter and doesn't want to be associated as a gutter forum and anybody who gives themselves the Username like Mr F did with such an innuendo is in my opinion half way to getting banned anyway.

The Username was taking the p to begin with, any borderline posts/threads were in my opinion the nail in the coffin.

Have you tried Googling "faqqer" to see what it means, Milan? Have you tried looking under FAQ on wikipedia, by any chance? I'd suggest that the answer to both of those would be "no".

The username is based on a propensity to ask, and answer questions. Originally faqqer was part of software used to maintain FAQ pages, as Google will tell you.

Quite how you read innuendo into that beats me.

[DS23]

there is a place for that and it is called test please delete.

[Pondlife]

No Milan, not on about Faqqer and co, they got done for swearing.

Some time ago one of our regular bannees kept posting ridiculous threads about nothing in particular like "what colour socks he was wearing" etc. He was doing rather a lot of it, but his threads were no worse than your 1, 2, 3 and so on yet you are still with us. Admitedly you dont do it every thread 10 times a day, but some of your content is just as bad.

Now you're definitely talking about threaded 'have you watched my pointless clip' or AtW 'what shall I have for lunch, oooh look at the squirels, 7' aren't you?

[old_kebab]

ahh I see

granted

will try to harder not to post sad content

Milan.

Some hope, Judas!

[The Lone Gunman]

ahh I see

granted

will try to harder not to post sad content

Milan.

It is OK occasionaly, sometimes even funny. We need a break from house prices, IR35, immigrants and new labour.

I agree that this is becoming more of a social club lately, but it comes and goes and when there is a serious issue we will probably take it up.

[milanbenes]

ahh I see

granted

will try to harder not to post sad content

Milan.

[The Lone Gunman]

No Milan, not on about Faqqer and co, they got done for swearing.

Some time ago one of our regular bannees kept posting ridiculous threads about nothing in particular like "what colour socks he was wearing" etc. He was doing rather a lot of it, but his threads were no worse than your 1, 2, 3 and so on yet you are still with us. Admitedly you dont do it every thread 10 times a day, but some of your content is just as bad.

[milanbenes]

LG,

I don't know the whole story, but my feeling is CUK forum is not the gutter and doesn't want to be associated as a gutter forum and anybody who gives themselves the Username like Mr F did with such an innuendo is in my opinion half way to getting banned anyway.

The Username was taking the p to begin with, any borderline posts/threads were in my opinion the nail in the coffin.

Milan.

[OrangeHopper]

Can you get banned for inane threads?

Why haven't I been banned then?

[Pondlife]

Because you start the most inane purile threads over and over and over again. Something which others have been banned for.

Therefore I deduce that you (milan) are both threaded and AtW. Where do I go to pick up my 5 whatevers

[The Lone Gunman]

LG,

why should I be banned ?

Milan.

Because you start the most inane purile threads over and over and over again. Something which others have been banned for.

[tay]

I will if I have an interesting topic to discuss, I wont start one just for the sake of it.