• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Is he mad?

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Is he mad?"

Collapse

  • King Cnvt
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    Well said. You seem to be rapidly joiningg Old Greg in the resident intellectuals club.
    Yes, come join sasguru, troll and I as the (oh dear, yellow card) edge in thought processes.
    Last edited by ferret; 26 September 2007, 09:43. Reason: I hope that was a typo...

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    He's neither mad nor uneducated. He's just received the standard, orthodox education of an Islamic country - that the Protocols of Zion are true, the world is run by a Jewish conspiracy, the holocaust is a hoax, and Israel must be destroyed.

    Islam is supposedly a later revelation of God than Christianity and Judaism, and therefore superior in every way. So the theory goes that Allah is unhappy with Muslims, and has allowed the establishment of the state of Israel as a reproach. The way to get back into Allah's good books, is therefore to work towards the annihilation of Israel.

    It's interesting that Islamic civilization was way ahead of European civilization 600 years ago. Now it seems to be in decline - while Europe went through the enlightenment, the east seems to have gone through a benightedment.
    Well said. You seem to be rapidly joiningg Old Greg in the resident intellectuals club.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    He's neither mad nor uneducated. He's just received the standard, orthodox education of an Islamic country - that the Protocols of Zion are true, the world is run by a Jewish conspiracy, the holocaust is a hoax, and Israel must be destroyed.

    Islam is supposedly a later revelation of God than Christianity and Judaism, and therefore superior in every way. So the theory goes that Allah is unhappy with Muslims, and has allowed the establishment of the state of Israel as a reproach. The way to get back into Allah's good books, is therefore to work towards the annihilation of Israel.

    It's interesting that Islamic civilization was way ahead of European civilization 600 years ago. Now it seems to be in decline - while Europe went through the enlightenment, the east seems to have gone through a benightedment.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cowboy Bob
    replied
    I believe what he actually said with regards to the holocaust is that he wished that Israel would stop using the holocaust as emotional blackmail to prevent criticism of Israel's treatment of the Palestinians, and that people should forget about the holocaust in that context.

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by Troll View Post
    wasn't so long ago that we used to jail them
    Wasn't that long ago (the 1860s) we used to top them, like in Iran, and until 1817 oral sex counted as sodomy for the purpose of the 1534 Sodomy Act.

    P.S. I vaguely recall reading that those Iranian guys received a capital sentence because they kidnapped and raped a 12 year old (or some similar age) boy.
    Last edited by OwlHoot; 25 September 2007, 23:49.

    Leave a comment:


  • realityhack
    replied
    Originally posted by daviejones View Post
    He also was reported to say that Israel should be wiped from the map if I recall...that is surely bordering on lunacy...
    No - that was a mistranslation - he said Zionism wiped from the Earth/Map - which has an altogether different meaning.

    Leave a comment:


  • DBA_bloke
    replied
    Originally posted by DaveB View Post
    "In Iran we don't have homosexuals like in your country. In Iran we do not have this phenomenon. I do not know who has told you we have it."
    -- Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, speaking at Columbia University

    Agreed, World Class Nutjob.
    I believe he said this whilst he was bumming his brother.

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    I'd like him to make the Holocaust Denial statement in Belgium...

    Leave a comment:


  • PRC1964
    replied
    The word "myth" is just the translation we have for what he said. He could easily have been saying that holocaust stories are exaggerated. Wikipedia says this of Myths "Use of the term by scholars does not imply that the narrative is either true or false. See also legend and tale."

    The holocaust is used by some as a blanket reason for never criticising Israel, and as that article states "At one point he demanded to know why raising issues about the Holocaust or the existence of Israel was not compatible with freedom of speech".

    Ahmadinejad is trying desperatly to hold onto power in Iran where he is not particularly popular. By demonising him the West run the risk of making him more popular at home.

    Leave a comment:


  • daviejones
    replied
    Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
    Ah - I'm not sure that lunatic is the right description, though.

    Certainly, I think that he needs to have a better look at the historical evidence, and perhaps be a bit more broad-minded in his approach to Iran's neighbours, but I'm not convinced that he has demonstrated lunacy.
    He also was reported to say that Israel should be wiped from the map if I recall...that is surely bordering on lunacy...

    Leave a comment:


  • TheFaQQer
    replied
    Originally posted by daviejones View Post
    I think he was expressing his amazement at comments made regarding the holocaust...so in that case I think he was justified in his remark. The Iranian President denies the holocaust ever happened so therefor qualifies as a lunatic in my book.
    Ah - I'm not sure that lunatic is the right description, though.

    Certainly, I think that he needs to have a better look at the historical evidence, and perhaps be a bit more broad-minded in his approach to Iran's neighbours, but I'm not convinced that he has demonstrated lunacy.

    Leave a comment:


  • daviejones
    replied
    [QUOTE=Troll;307100]
    Originally posted by daviejones View Post
    I personally find it unacceptable and Western civilisation also finds it unacceptable... but unless you want to re impose colonial rule you will have to accept that others have different views on the subject.
    You can hope that over time a more enlightened attitude evolves, but Islamic civilisation IMHO is several centuries behind Western in terms of human rights,
    unless of course you would propose a regime change and an imposition of a Westernised value system ...
    I also said it was wrong, I expressed no opinion on how we were going to educate these civilisations...merely stating that a man who openly says that there was no holocaust, sanctions public hanging for gays etc, is a lunatic and should not be in a position of power.

    Leave a comment:


  • daviejones
    replied
    Originally posted by Troll View Post
    It came across as very bad manners, not sure what he hoped to achieve
    I think he was expressing his amazement at comments made regarding the holocaust...so in that case I think he was justified in his remark. The Iranian President denies the holocaust ever happened so therefor qualifies as a lunatic in my book.

    Leave a comment:


  • Troll
    replied
    Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
    I would assume that you meant Mr Bollinger, then - although I'm not sure that he classes as a lunatic. Incredibly rude, certainly, but I would hope that one does not become the head of a university by being a lunatic.
    It came across as very bad manners, not sure what he hoped to achieve

    Leave a comment:


  • TheFaQQer
    replied
    Originally posted by daviejones View Post
    I would have thought it obvious..
    I would assume that you meant Mr Bollinger, then - although I'm not sure that he classes as a lunatic. Incredibly rude, certainly, but I would hope that one does not become the head of a university by being a lunatic.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X