• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "What happened to beautiful political speeches?"

Collapse

  • chicane
    replied
    Originally posted by xoggoth View Post
    Who wants emotional vague crap like that? I would much rather have someone who tells us concisely and in plain terms what he plans to do. Party political broadcasts should read like technical reports.
    Indeed. It's one thing telling people what your plans are. It's another thing telling them how you're going to implement these plans within a constrained budget and taking into account bizarre humans rights laws pushed onto us by Europe.

    But then again. party political broadcasts in the form of technical reports would be a bit like a Mr Kipling cakes advert describing the cakes as "rehydrated chunks of hydrogenated fat, moulded with flour in a greasy factory together with a mix of sugar and mashed-up fruit that was too old for Tesco".

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    Who wants emotional vague crap like that? I would much rather have someone who tells us concisely and in plain terms what he plans to do. Party political broadcasts should read like technical reports.

    Leave a comment:


  • Troll
    replied
    Originally posted by Joe Black View Post
    Tried to Google it but no matter which bits I searched on the results always pointed back to your original post...so thought it might be your own.
    Wot ... made it up??

    Leave a comment:


  • wendigo100
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    ... but true, nevertheless
    Aha! I thought so too but was too scared to say so out loud.

    Leave a comment:


  • Joe Black
    replied
    Originally posted by Troll View Post
    Berlin, Reichstag speech on October 6, 1939
    Tried to Google it but no matter which bits I searched on the results always pointed back to your original post...so thought it might be your own.

    Leave a comment:


  • Joe Black
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    Comes of being a vegetarian humanist apparently.:
    I'm a vegetarian, and human apparently.

    Leave a comment:


  • DBA_bloke
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    Not very elegant, but true, nevertheless
    Did Rumsfeld write the Abbott & Costello "Who's on First?" sketch?

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by Bagpuss View Post
    There are known knowns.
    These are things we know that we know.
    There are known unknowns.
    That is to say, there are things that we know we don't know.
    But there are also unknown unknowns.
    There are things we don't know we don't know.
    Not very elegant, but true, nevertheless

    Leave a comment:


  • DBA_bloke
    replied
    "Sometimes the only way you conquer the pull of power is to set it down. It is difficult to know how to make this speech today."
    - Blair's farewell speech

    Could have been written as, "I'm off. This bloody war's a f--- albatross round me bleedin' neck. All yours, Gordon..."

    Leave a comment:


  • King Cnvt
    replied
    Education, edukation, ejukashun.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bagpuss
    replied
    There are known knowns.
    These are things we know that we know.
    There are known unknowns.
    That is to say, there are things that we know we don't know.
    But there are also unknown unknowns.
    There are things we don't know we don't know.

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by Troll View Post
    Berlin, Reichstag speech on October 6, 1939
    Yes Hitler was a devious git, wasn't he?

    Leave a comment:


  • Troll
    replied
    Originally posted by Joe Black View Post
    Where's that quote meant to have come from Troll?
    Berlin, Reichstag speech on October 6, 1939

    Leave a comment:


  • DBA_bloke
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    I thought it was the Mafia, but hey! what do I know?
    Russian Mafia. You were half right.

    Leave a comment:


  • DBA_bloke
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    Or there's this one...
    Or, in short: "Those feckin Ruskies will look like a bunch of twats if we land on the moon first."

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X