• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Oracle Contracting and rates"

Collapse

  • lilelvis2000
    replied
    Gosh , where's that! that would be a large increase on my current rate...where I do both Oracle and Access development.

    I like Oracle too...but I've found more bugs in six months of Oracle development than I ever did in three years of SQL Server development.

    Found another one this morning. The DBA suggested a restart....That reminds me of Windows 3.1..get an error...reboot.

    Leave a comment:


  • MobileCheese
    replied
    £550 - £560 a day for Oracle developers at my place, location London.

    Leave a comment:


  • mace
    replied
    Originally posted by DBA_bloke View Post
    I see. DB2 is good, no question, but owing to it being a bit of a niche market, it's never going to get the sort of investment that Oracle or SQL Server does. Shame, because IBM's stuff is usually excellent. They just don't have a clue about selling their wares.
    I'd agree with you on that. My perception of the database market is:-

    Oracle dominant on unix/linux platforms but losing market share to DB2 and specialist vendors on unix and to SQL*Server on windows.

    DB2 on unix/linux/windows beginning to make some noise. Dominant on mainframe and as/400.

    SQL*Server is dominant on windows platforms and seems to be the database of choice for data marts.

    Teradata/Netezza/Datallegro etc. specialist warehouse appliance vendors.

    Database vendors market share seem much more evenly spread in data warehousing than in the transactional database arena.

    Leave a comment:


  • DBA_bloke
    replied
    Originally posted by Moscow Mule View Post
    Only because I didn't know where to pitch my comeback

    If you say DB2 to somebody with no idea, they immediate assume you want to run it on an x86 box.
    I see. DB2 is good, no question, but owing to it being a bit of a niche market, it's never going to get the sort of investment that Oracle or SQL Server does. Shame, because IBM's stuff is usually excellent. They just don't have a clue about selling their wares.

    Leave a comment:


  • Moscow Mule
    replied
    Originally posted by DBA_bloke View Post
    You are confusing a platform with an RDBMS.
    Only because I didn't know where to pitch my comeback

    If you say DB2 to somebody with no idea, they immediate assume you want to run it on an x86 box.

    Leave a comment:


  • DBA_bloke
    replied
    Originally posted by Fishface View Post
    I agree, most companies don't need it and fail to understand the concept of appropriate technologies.

    Its the 'Oracle' word... - business guys get all hot under the collar - IT guys get their dicks out, do helicopteros and start teabagging each other - with a bit of tech talk for foreplay - its hideous to watch.

    more women in IT please - I can't stand all the techy/macho posturing
    It isn't posturing. Oracle is the best. Women in IT? Who'd cook our dinners and wash our clothes? I'm all for a bit of Womens' Lib.: as long as the ironing gets done, where's the harm?

    Leave a comment:


  • DBA_bloke
    replied
    Originally posted by Moscow Mule View Post
    iSeries. Will run forever. You might need Milan to change the tapes ever so often (less so if you invest in a silo).
    You are confusing a platform with an RDBMS. However, the iSeries (or, as I still call it, the AS/400) is a thing of beauty and I will never understand why IBM didn't advertise it properly. It's a bloomin' miracle platform. If IBM had bothered to advertise it, then a) Everyone would be using it and b) Oracle would port their stuff across to it, as would everyone else.

    Leave a comment:


  • Fishface
    replied
    Originally posted by King Cnvt View Post
    Not in the Oracle world. Oracle is the Aston Martin of the software world. Everything can be bespoke and wonderful, if you think that £1K for platinum ciggy lighter or bit of carbon fibre on the air-vent is a fair price.

    Why companies use Oracle with it's astounding fees is beyond me, when there are alternatives at a fraction of the cost now.
    I agree, most companies don't need it and fail to understand the concept of appropriate technologies.

    Its the 'Oracle' word... - business guys get all hot under the collar - IT guys get their dicks out, do helicopteros and start teabagging each other - with a bit of tech talk for foreplay - its hideous to watch.

    more women in IT please - I can't stand all the techy/macho posturing

    Leave a comment:


  • Moscow Mule
    replied
    Originally posted by DBA_bloke View Post
    Name one RDBMS that doesn't require maintenance? You have a year to come up with one. See you then.
    iSeries. Will run forever. You might need Milan to change the tapes ever so often (less so if you invest in a silo).

    Leave a comment:


  • DBA_bloke
    replied
    Originally posted by Moscow Mule View Post
    Why you'd want to use a database that needs an administrator for its day to day running is beyond me.
    Name one RDBMS that doesn't require maintenance? You have a year to come up with one. See you then.

    Leave a comment:


  • Moscow Mule
    replied
    Why you'd want to use a database that needs an administrator for its day to day running is beyond me.

    Leave a comment:


  • ChimpMaster
    replied
    Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
    ............ I'm also an Apps developer, bespoke DBA, and have niche skills which earn me more as well. Cover all bases!
    I once covered all bases, on a 1st date ...it was great aye

    Leave a comment:


  • DBA_bloke
    replied
    Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
    I've never understood why, though! I joined Oracle as a bespoke developer, and only moved into eBusiness Suite when I left. I find Apps work less interesting, more restrictive, but better paying than bespoke work.

    Apps DBA I understand even less about why they are paid more - all they do is patch and clone. The number of restrictions on what you can and can't change / tweak / tune etc. between being a bespoke DBA and and Apps DBA is huge.

    So, as well as being a bespoke developer, I'm also an Apps developer, bespoke DBA, and have niche skills which earn me more as well. Cover all bases!
    Agreed! Most of the Apps. DBAs I have known have no idea at all about Oracle architecture, or anything much beyond version 7, having stuck to Apps. and its peculiar, irritating and dull ways. Still, hats off to them, they earn a lot per gig.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheFaQQer
    replied
    Originally posted by SallyAnne View Post
    Oracle DBA and Oracle Apps DBA are 2 very different things too mate.
    Much like Oracle Developer and Oracle Apps Developer (me).

    You can normally add at least £150 a day onto an Apps gig. At least.
    I've never understood why, though! I joined Oracle as a bespoke developer, and only moved into eBusiness Suite when I left. I find Apps work less interesting, more restrictive, but better paying than bespoke work.

    Apps DBA I understand even less about why they are paid more - all they do is patch and clone. The number of restrictions on what you can and can't change / tweak / tune etc. between being a bespoke DBA and and Apps DBA is huge.

    So, as well as being a bespoke developer, I'm also an Apps developer, bespoke DBA, and have niche skills which earn me more as well. Cover all bases!

    Leave a comment:


  • King Cnvt
    replied
    Originally posted by DBA_bloke View Post
    Happily, you have no say in the RDBMS that banks use for the important stuff. Thank feck. Oracle is expensive because it's good. SQL Server, Sybase, etc.? A bunch of sad-arsed toys.
    I guess these city financial places can afford it, after all, they are making billions from sub prime mortgages aren't they.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X