Originally posted by wendigo100
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Easy Peasy Physics
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Easy Peasy Physics"
Collapse
-
D'oh - didn't actually look at the article, just opened the PDF.Originally posted by realityhack View PostThen you have failed. 0% for you melad.
(on the frikkin news page containing the link to the test paper)
And got somewhere in between my original 100% estimate and your 0%
Leave a comment:
-
This lowering of the bar is filtering its way down into the media.
In the Times yesterday, some bright spark did a piece on tarring and feathering through the ages, starting with the crew on Richard the Lionheart's ships in 911.
Yep, 911.
Leave a comment:
-
Then you have failed. 0% for you melad.Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostWhere are the answers? In the absence of finding an answer paper, I must conclude that I got 100% until proven otherwise.
(on the frikkin news page containing the link to the test paper)
Leave a comment:
-
Where are the answers? In the absence of finding an answer paper, I must conclude that I got 100% until proven otherwise.Originally posted by realityhack View PostMy mark, without cheating, and under 20min, was 92.5%
A few of those questions were very badly worded.
Leave a comment:
-
One of life's great posters is that one with the stunna scratching her arse on a tennis court.Originally posted by flatfooter View PostI'm not one of life's great posters - but I had to find somewhere to moan about this. If I had a kid who had taken this paper I would be livid (unless of course they passed with flying colours!)
Leave a comment:
-
I'm not one of life's great posters - but I had to find somewhere to moan about this. If I had a kid who had taken this paper I would be livid (unless of course they passed with flying colours!)
Leave a comment:
-
I say A. Their evidence might have some inconsistencies so you could use it to disprove it.Originally posted by Murder1 View PostOur moon seems to disappear during an eclipse. Some people say that this is because an old lady covers the moon with her cloak. She does this so that thieves cannot steal the coins on the surface.
Which of these would help scientists prove or disprove this theory?
A. Collect evidence from people who believe the lady sees the thieves
B. Shout to the lady that the thieves are coming
C. Send a probe to the moon to search for coins
D. Look for fingerprints
Other than that I'm tempted to take a bunch of these tests so I can put 20 GCSE's at A* or whatever on my CV. Do you think it would help me get more lucrative contracts?
Leave a comment:
-
Maybe the answer isn't actually C, which suggests we spend £billions on a space mission to disprove the lucid imagination of some moron in an examining board...
Leave a comment:
-
My mark, without cheating, and under 20min, was 92.5%
A few of those questions were very badly worded.
Leave a comment:
-
Strange place these examiners live on. Here on Earth either the sun disappears or the moon turns dark red.Our moon seems to disappear during an eclipse...
Leave a comment:
-
None of themOriginally posted by Murder1 View PostOur moon seems to disappear during an eclipse. Some people say that this is because an old lady covers the moon with her cloak. She does this so that thieves cannot steal the coins on the surface.
Which of these would help scientists prove or disprove this theory?
A. Collect evidence from people who believe the lady sees the thieves
B. Shout to the lady that the thieves are coming
C. Send a probe to the moon to search for coins
D. Look for fingerprints

A. Belief is not proof
B. The lady may not hear you, absence of the lady at that time is not proof
C. All this would do is demonstrate that there are no coins there now. Maybe the thieves took 'em
D. Where?
It's daft that paper. I presume C. since the other three make no sense anyway.
Leave a comment:
-
That is shoockkking... I guess it's foundation what do you expect.Originally posted by Troll View Posthttp://extras.timesonline.co.uk/pdfs/exampaper.pdf
.... and they want to make it easier
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle2344054.ece
Leave a comment:
-
using a right outer join gives a result of 94 newtons per square yard.Originally posted by richard-af View Post2007 Physics A-Level Question:
Karl is preparing to go on a shooting spree at school.
He has 5 handguns, each with 2 clips of 20 bullets.
It takes 3 seconds to reload a clip.
Karl wants to waste at least 56 fellow pupils.
He thinks he has 15 minutes to perform his task, before the Police arrive.
He has calculated that he will need, on average, to fire 3 bullets per person, to ensure a kill.
Assuming standard gravity at 9.8 m/s², how long will it take Karl to get onto Jeremy Kyle, and sell an option on a book deal in time for the Christmas market?
Leave a comment:
-
2007 Physics A-Level Question:
Karl is preparing to go on a shooting spree at school.
He has 5 handguns, each with 2 clips of 20 bullets.
It takes 3 seconds to reload a clip.
Karl wants to waste at least 56 fellow pupils.
He thinks he has 15 minutes to perform his task, before the Police arrive.
He has calculated that he will need, on average, to fire 3 bullets per person, to ensure a kill.
Assuming standard gravity at 9.8 m/s², how long will it take Karl to get onto Jeremy Kyle, and sell an option on a book deal in time for the Christmas market?
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Leave a comment: