Originally posted by NickFitz
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: A-level day
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "A-level day"
Collapse
-
Overall only 3% failed the A-levels. That isn't an exam. How can you set an exam where you are virtually guaranteed to pass? How thick must you be to me in the bottom 3%
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/6949084.stm
Leave a comment:
-
I could buy gradual improvement over time (maybe) but every single year no drops without fail.Last year 24.1% were awarded the top A grade - up 1.3 percentage points and an improvement for the 24th year in a row.
It's stretching credibility a little bit.
Leave a comment:
-
I think using the standard distribution approach should be fine. If there are easier papers some years than the others then the better people will just do better. How well anyone does at A Level is surely a combination of brains, effort and personality? Saying that the distribution of those is going to be different between people born in different years in my book is akin to believing in Chinese horoscopes.Originally posted by Spartacus View PostThat's what they used to do. However, it is true to say that makes comparison between years difficult and/or meaningless.
Oh yeah, I was born in the year of the pig, and I think that I have all the "pig characteristics"
Leave a comment:
-
Whoever told you life was fair was lying.Originally posted by Ardesco View PostAh but that is not fair because the top 5% one year may not be a good as the top 50% were the previous year!!!
Why?Originally posted by Moscow Mule View PostBecause you should be measured against a set standard, not everybody else in your year.
I managed to get an B at GCSE English this way, but I still start sentences with "Because".
It seems to work OK for a lot of university degrees, where the mark on a curve - if it's good enough for Harvard, why not for A levels and GCSEs?
Leave a comment:
-
That's a 2 C.S.E. Grade 3s and an unplaced, for us old-timers.Originally posted by TonyEnglish View PostFrom the article
"Melanie Slade, footballer Theo Walcott's girlfriend, scored two Bs and a C"Last edited by richard-af; 16 August 2007, 13:58.
Leave a comment:
-
From the article
"Melanie Slade, footballer Theo Walcott's girlfriend, scored two Bs and a C"
Are those her grades or does it mean Theos' balls and cock? Fnaarrr fnarrr!
"That's what they used to do. However, it is true to say that makes comparison between years difficult and/or meaningless. "
No it doesn't. Those in the top 5% will always be in the top 5%. The problem here is that this lot wanted to show an improvement, so they had to change the way the grades were set and effectively degrade all other a levels in the process. We now have some a levels where 96% pass the exam. How thick do you have to be to be in the bottom 4%?
Leave a comment:
-
Naughty Reuters! That's an old piccy. Obviously brought back out from under the mattress for today's superb achievements.Originally posted by PRC1964 View PostLast edited by richard-af; 17 August 2007, 08:07.
Leave a comment:
-
Torygraph offering a bit of competition:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main...ults&HBX_OU=50
Leave a comment:
-
That's what they used to do. However, it is true to say that makes comparison between years difficult and/or meaningless.Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostI don't understand why they don't just mark on a grade curve, i.e. the top 5% get an A, next 10% get a B etc. etc. That way, the best always stand out.
Leave a comment:
-
Because you should be measured against a set standard, not everybody else in your year.Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostI don't understand why they don't just mark on a grade curve, i.e. the top 5% get an A, next 10% get a B etc. etc. That way, the best always stand out.
I managed to get an B at GCSE English this way, but I still start sentences with "Because".
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers


Leave a comment: