Well the mods must have done a pretty speedy job. I was checking the board every couple of hours yesterday and didn't see anything of questionable legality.
A bit like if Eddie Fetch had stopped the Thriller in Manila in the 11th instead of the 14th, to use a pugilistic analogy.
well done mods*
tl
*and rockers. ThunderLizard is an equal opportunities poster, daddyos.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: What did I miss
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "What did I miss"
Collapse
-
es rat ramsOriginally posted by malvolio
Llareggub - or the joke doesn't work... 
Actually I prefer Terry Pratchett's equivalent Welsh village - Pant y Liner
Leave a comment:
-
Hey, a contractors reputation is very important, its his livlihood. I guess the same applies to accountants so good one simon.
Leave a comment:
-
Absolutely. I'd be pretty p1ssed off if anonymous trolls wer posting that Old Greg Ltd. is dishonest and incompetent (don't even think about it anyone or I'll see you in court).Originally posted by oraclesmithYes, but us anonymous posters haven't got a public reputation to protect.
Anyone can put anything on these boards and it will stay a little while until they get banned or people lose interest. It's a competitive market and few unanswered knocks can lose these firms business. If we don't behave ourselves, I guess there won't be a board at all.
Leave a comment:
-
Yes, but us anonymous posters haven't got a public reputation to protect.Originally posted by cailin maithBut I too think that it shouldn't be a big deal........ should it?
Anyone can put anything on these boards and it will stay a little while until they get banned or people lose interest. It's a competitive market and few unanswered knocks can lose these firms business. If we don't behave ourselves, I guess there won't be a board at all.
Leave a comment:
-
Er, because he got the hump when some twonk tried to rubbish his integrity. Good for him.Originally posted by SallyAnneI dont want to start it all off again, cause yous know I adore SJD and will be with them for life...but dont you think they were a little over sensitive? Why was Simon that bothered anyway?
Leave a comment:
-
It was really, especially with that fella spamming the whole board - gimp! But I too think that it shouldn't be a big deal........ should it? I'm afraid to say anything else really 'cos I don't want it all to kick off again...Originally posted by Old GregA lot of posts have been deleted and users banned. It was getting way out of hand yesterday.
Leave a comment:
-
A lot of posts have been deleted and users banned. It was getting way out of hand yesterday.Originally posted by SallyAnneI dont want to start it all off again, cause yous know I adore SJD and will be with them for life...but dont you think they were a little over sensitive? Why was Simon that bothered anyway?
Leave a comment:
-
From tiny acorns grow mighty oaks.Originally posted by SallyAnneI dont want to start it all off again, cause yous know I adore SJD and will be with them for life...but dont you think they were a little over sensitive? Why was Simon that bothered anyway?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ArdescoOh idiots trying to cause problems for SJD and CUK.
I dont want to start it all off again, cause yous know I adore SJD and will be with them for life...but dont you think they were a little over sensitive? Why was Simon that bothered anyway?
Leave a comment:
-
Actually the second 'l' wouldn't fit, it's better with the inherent irony.Originally posted by Old GregI've only just realised that the spelling sign is 'speling'. Nice.
Leave a comment:
-
I've only just realised that the spelling sign is 'speling'. Nice.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by richard-afLlaraggub.
Llareggub
(Read it backwards)
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by richard-afLlaraggub.
Llareggub - or the joke doesn't work... 
Actually I prefer Terry Pratchett's equivalent Welsh village - Pant y Liner
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Should a new limited company not making much money pay a salary/dividend? Yesterday 08:43
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Feb 12 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47

Leave a comment: