• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Brown - Income Diverter"

Collapse

  • richard-af
    replied
    Originally posted by Ruprect
    Jog on, shouldn't your tag have a "d" in it? you look a bit racial otherwise
    No. The real name's Roger.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ruprect
    replied
    Jog on, shouldn't your tag have a "d" in it? you look a bit racial otherwise

    Leave a comment:


  • Jog On
    replied
    I wasn't going to claim my lunch today - now I'm defnintely going to

    Leave a comment:


  • wendigo100
    replied
    A good illustration of why everybody else should also seek to minimise their tax burden within the law.

    Ignore this "fair share" bollocks that Brown and the rest try and beat everyone with.

    Leave a comment:


  • Gibbon
    replied
    Sorry for the old news. Only just came across a reference to it in yesterdays paper.

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    Keep up at the back, please - this is weeks old. And it's worse than you think.

    The property in question is available for rent becuase us taxpayers are funding his London pied-a-terre despite him living in No10. And it was bought at well under market valuation by Brown from the Maxwell pension fund estate that was being wound up and dumping all those nice Labour-type voters in the doodoo. And financial advice for the deal was prvided by Mr Geoffrey Robinson, who also helped Mr Mandelson obtain a mortgage as you may recall. And the property was gifted to Mrs Brown with the clear intention of giving her a self-sufficient income, a commercial arrangement that is virtually unthinkable between two people who aren't married.

    Hypocrisy? No, of course not, merely prudent use of one's assets and tax allowances...

    Leave a comment:


  • King Cnvt
    replied
    Originally posted by Gibbon
    In the Independent yesterday one of the columnist's seem to let slip that now Mrs Brown is not working then Mr Brown has diverted income from some of his properties to her and thereby saving on tax.
    He doesn't want to let that cnt Brown get his hands on it.

    Leave a comment:


  • daviejones
    replied
    Originally posted by Gibbon
    In the Independent yesterday one of the columnist's seem to let slip that now Mrs Brown is not working then Mr Brown has diverted income from some of his properties to her and thereby saving on tax.
    Surely that is unethical? Sorry, should not use the word "ethical" when referring to a politician.

    Leave a comment:


  • Gibbon
    started a topic Brown - Income Diverter

    Brown - Income Diverter

    In the Independent yesterday one of the columnist's seem to let slip that now Mrs Brown is not working then Mr Brown has diverted income from some of his properties to her and thereby saving on tax.

Working...
X