• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "And I thought I was odd..."

Collapse

  • wendigo100
    replied
    Originally posted by richard-af
    It's David Icke, all over again.
    Yes, it's obviously a sine.

    Leave a comment:


  • richard-af
    replied
    It's David Icke, all over again.

    Leave a comment:


  • wendigo100
    replied
    Originally posted by smee.again
    Good trickynometry input there...turning the topic a full 90 degrees!!!
    Just a minute...

    OK, I'll get me cotan...

    Leave a comment:


  • smee.again
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru
    Good SOH boys. You CAHn do it if you try.

    Good trickynometry input there...turning the topic a full 90 degrees!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Good SOH boys. You CAHn do it if you try. TO An extent.

    Leave a comment:


  • DaveB
    replied
    Nothing to do with parallell lines then? Or am I having a Blond(ie) moment?

    Leave a comment:


  • smee.again
    replied
    Originally posted by wendigo100
    That's cos you're a lateral thinker...


    Yeah but sometimes I just cannot see the isosceles for the trees!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • wendigo100
    replied
    Originally posted by smee.again
    Very good....that's me, always going perpendicular to the point in question...
    That's cos you're a lateral thinker...

    Leave a comment:


  • smee.again
    replied
    Originally posted by Chugnut
    Just like you guys; always going off on a tangent.


    Very good....that's me, always going perpendicular to the point in question...

    Leave a comment:


  • Chugnut
    replied
    Originally posted by smee.again
    I think you need to be more vertical in your thinking and corresponding thought processes. Maybe even having an alternate angle on things!!
    Just like you guys; always going off on a tangent.

    Leave a comment:


  • smee.again
    replied
    Originally posted by wendigo100
    True, sorry, I didn't expect anyone to be complementary.

    I think you need to be more vertical in your thinking and corresponding thought processes. Maybe even having an alternate angle on things!!

    Leave a comment:


  • wendigo100
    replied
    Originally posted by smee.again
    You're right. You need an acute sense of humour to understand it. IGMC.
    True, sorry, I didn't expect anyone to be complementary.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kyajae
    replied
    Well, Robbie Williams is loving angels instead. And nobody thought that was odd.

    Leave a comment:


  • AlfredJPruffock
    replied
    Originally posted by DaveB
    Royalty, what do you expect after all those generations of inbreeding. Mind you, if she is getting poeple to cought up 24,000 euros for the priveledge she can't be totally bonkers.
    Well in fact it is 3000 Euros over three years which works out as 1000 per year. 24000 is the rate on Norwegian Krona.

    As for Angels - I would be sceptical too - only I did have the most extraordinary experience in 1995 in a disused Church near Kentish Town (the church has since been restored) whereby I encountered an Angel or perhaps more accurately it perceived me - I believe none less than the ArchAngel Raphael (Raphael - Hebrew for he who has healed).

    At any rate it was to say the least an overwhelming vision - I didnt even discuss for two years after it happened - I am not religious I should add - and that was only because I was told two prophecies about myself - one which had after two years become manifestly true - in fact the first eveidence started in less than five days - the other prediction I will not be able to verify until the day I die.

    There is some background to the above but I dont really have the time to go into the details - but there you have it.

    Laugh if you like - but the above is true.
    Last edited by AlfredJPruffock; 30 July 2007, 11:11.

    Leave a comment:


  • smee.again
    replied
    Originally posted by Moose423956
    Sorry, that's too obtuse for me.

    You're right. You need an acute sense of humour to understand it. IGMC.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X