- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Discrimination?
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Discrimination?"
Collapse
-
One can hardly expect contractors, being themselves paid only for the hours they actually put in, to be particularly sympathetic with any such case.
-
Originally posted by snawI agree they seem excessive. But put it in the context of the salaries and earnings potential of the sort of people we're talking about (High basics and 100% bonuses) and suddenly it's not always as outlandish as they appear to the layman. Plus I think the tactic usually is go in at a high end to hopefully get the actual figure you want (You'd know that in recruitment mate?).
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DodgyAgentGood point snaw, however the sums of money that they are claiming rather strips the sympathy vote away from them.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by snawWhy is the immediate assumption that the woman, whichever one it happens to be, is always the one falsly claiming and that the banks are innocent?
My wife is ex IB, she had to work twice as hard as the guys and put up with this sort of crap for years and not get the same opportunities she'd have got if she'd been male, to the point she left it entirely (Best move she ever made, and one many women opt to do).
I've worked in trading environments most of my career and seen them first hand, and I can honestly say they're still some of the most sexist & bigoted work environments you'll come across in this country.
What kind of argument is it to say that you should be strong enough to put up with this kind of behaviour. Why? Is it some undefinable reflection on someones ability to do their job if they don't like being ridiculed at work. Am I missing something here?
Leave a comment:
-
Why is the immediate assumption that the woman, whichever one it happens to be, is always the one falsly claiming and that the banks are innocent?
My wife is ex IB, she had to work twice as hard as the guys and put up with this sort of crap for years and not get the same opportunities she'd have got if she'd been male, to the point she left it entirely (Best move she ever made, and one many women opt to do).
I've worked in trading environments most of my career and seen them first hand, and I can honestly say they're still some of the most sexist & bigoted work environments you'll come across in this country.
What kind of argument is it to say that you should be strong enough to put up with this kind of behaviour. Why? Is it some undefinable reflection on someones ability to do their job if they don't like being ridiculed at work. Am I missing something here?
Leave a comment:
-
Course, she could be in for a right old payout if she can prove anything that she was asked to do was a 'veiled' threat!
Leave a comment:
-
So she didn't get as big a bonus in the year she took 6 months off, and when she did return, everything wasn't the same as she left it.
It's appalling what employers get away with. Disgraceful.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by gingerjediNah, she's wearing a crucifix... that’ll be the real reason
And she's hardly going to get an easy ride working for the BNP with a name like that
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by John GaltWoman seeks £1.3 million compensation
These cases are getting out of hand - why does it never occur to any of these women that maybe they are not being discriminated against but their work rate/performance did actually deteriorate?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by threadedOr she wore purple to the office!
And she's hardly going to get an easy ride working for the BNP with a name like that
Leave a comment:
-
Discrimination?
Woman seeks £1.3 million compensation
These cases are getting out of hand - why does it never occur to any of these women that maybe they are not being discriminated against but their work rate/performance did actually deteriorate?Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Yesterday 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
Leave a comment: