• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Wouldn't this be better used on Blair & Brown?"

Collapse

  • xoggoth
    replied
    Oh a lie detector.I thought you meant a machine gun.

    Leave a comment:


  • PAH
    replied
    It'll be the simplest system in history. One line: Output "They're lying".

    Still take 600 people to plan and document before being rewritten by IBM into a collosal turd that's the biggest system in history.

    I've got nothing against IBM, except experience.

    Leave a comment:


  • BoredBloke
    replied
    It's no use on Brown and Blair as it doesn't shoot bullets!

    Leave a comment:


  • threaded
    replied
    Originally posted by Sysman
    From that BBC report:

    "According to government figures, benefit fraud cost the UK economy about £0.7bn in 2005/06."


    A mere drop in the ocean when you consider the amounts wasted on govt IT projects.
    Agreed, it'll probably cost more to outfit the offices, train the staff, pay the consultants to measure the results etc. etc. etc. than they'll possibly ever recover.

    Leave a comment:


  • PAH
    replied
    That's because the system is so lax that most benefit claimants don't need to commit fraud, they've no intention of working, legitimately or not.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sysman
    replied
    From that BBC report:

    "According to government figures, benefit fraud cost the UK economy about £0.7bn in 2005/06."


    A mere drop in the ocean when you consider the amounts wasted on govt IT projects.

    Leave a comment:


  • andy
    replied
    nah they have perfected the art of lying

    Leave a comment:


  • Barriebazg
    replied
    Yeah that would be perfect for them

    Leave a comment:


  • Kyajae
    started a topic Wouldn't this be better used on Blair & Brown?

    Wouldn't this be better used on Blair & Brown?

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6528425.stm

Working...
X