Interesting that HMRC's own staff think both IR35 and the new MSC regs are going to be extremely difficult to enforce....... last conversation I had with a compliance officer he said (genuine quote) "I don't know why they don't just slap an NI charge on dividends......."
Word in the MSC provider world at the moment seems to be that they are all just going to move to PSC and open individual bank accounts. Having read the draft documents I personally don't think this will cut it but general thinking amongst the providers is that it will take at least 18 months for them to bring a test case, by which time "someone" will have developed a more robust solution that they can all follow like sheep.
If I was them I'd be MUCH more worried about the 3rd party recovery legislation.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: MSC stuff in Telegraph
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "MSC stuff in Telegraph"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by piscesNo. They just don't know what they are doing.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by bobhopeDo you ever get the feeling that the government really, really doesn't like us?
Leave a comment:
-
Perpetual traveller: learn a bit of foreign language and only do 6 monthers in each country.
Met a Canadian who was doing just that, (and a few other dodgy things as well, but that's another story)
Leave a comment:
-
The three day week only works for foreigners, where they fly to Jersey for a couple of days, and then are exempt from tax for their earnings abroad, i.e. in Jersey where they earn most of their money.
If you're British you can only spend on average 91 days in the country but up to 183 in any one tax year. So over a few years a three day week would put you way over the limit.
183 day rule is meant to allow foreigners to work for 6 months before being liable. You would then need to take an 18 month break before exploiting that one again.
Leave a comment:
-
I thought they had been saying: that the discussions were basically one sided with Gordos minions saying to stop it ASAP as we're going to retrospect it. IIRC one of the female ministerial flunkies was wittering on about "intention" to a previous law and that the intention argument would be used so it wouldn't really be retrospect... Semantics to you or me I would suggest.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by threadedAll non criminal law is retrospectable. Criminal is stopped by virtue of the HRA.
HTH
http://www.itcontractor.com/Articles...00&photopage=0
Leave a comment:
-
Oddly enough I know a few air crew types and they work through a Swiss agency. Live in Denmark, but don't pay any income taxes anywhere.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by andyThere is some kind of loophole that if you spend 3 days in a week in UK excluding the day of travel you are non-resident for tax purpose in UK . Saw some programme on telly about how the topshots avoid taxes this way.
But not always: a pilot who spends less than 91 days per year in the UK was nevertheless recently judged resident, because the UK remained his base.
And do not think that what works for the rich will work for you.
Leave a comment:
-
"I agree, this was always how I saw IR35 with the government responding to lobbying from the major players and trying to restructure the services market by making some suppliers (us) uncompetitive and deter entry to that market."
It's not just us! Their people know how much they are charged out at, so it's harder for the consultancies to keep hold of them - unless they could think of a way of reducing the opportunities.........................
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Euro-commuterA "flexible" supply of workers who are nonetheless constrained to pay the "correct" tax by PAYE is exactly what the government wants. Having every contractor forced into working for EDS and Accenture is the ideal way to ensure this. I'm sure they consulted "industry representatives" and were told that this was so..
Originally posted by Euro-commuterPay much less tax? Where would that be then?
More flexible vehicle? Not in most places I've worked.
Commute to Euroland? You mean remain resident in the UK? Then you still pay tax here.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by MobileCheeseBut what about the cr*p about it being new legislation rather than re-interpretation and therefore not retrospecticable ?
HTH
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by MickeyPPlease tell me how you can commute to work in the UK and get non residence status in the UK at the same time?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by andyTime to move to monaco just like many great business leaders in this country.
Commute to UK for work and get non residence status.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Euro-commuterWhat else would you do?
How will they find themselves in a fix? The people who are contractors won't disappear, they just won't be contractors any more. If it's no longer worth it to work as a one-person contractor, most will just go into employment. EDS and Accenture will take you on. Of course, you won't make so much.
And I'm sure that many agencies will be happy to become "software houses" paying you a salary of 35-40% of the billing rate. If you didn't like them as agents, wait till they're your boss!
The gov should be in a fix...taxpayers should be asking why there are Accenture people working on Long term Gov projects for £1200 a day when a contractor would be on £500 or a perm civil servant on £200.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Which IT contractor skills will be top five in 2025? Jan 2 09:08
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
Leave a comment: