• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Cheat!

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Cheat!"

Collapse

  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post

    It's like sockies. Ban them for life, abuse them with banned medical substances, intentionally cheat with their wife while dressed in sporting attire etc.
    NLUK & you have exciting lives!

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by ladymuck View Post
    What complete nonsense, who "accidentally" accepts a trophy? So she pulled out of the race and then hung around at the end to collect a prize? Yeah, pull the other one.


    Who gets "injured", gets in a car for 2.5 miles, gets out and then continues to run the rest of the race if they didn't intend to cheat?

    Leave a comment:


  • jamesbrown
    replied
    Originally posted by JustKeepSwimming View Post
    That ban isn't long enough. Any intentional cheating in sport really should be a lifetime ban.

    It's greyer when it's substance abuse, as there have been incidents where I genuinely believe it was unintentional, like taking medicine that contained a banned substance.
    It's like sockies. Ban them for life, abuse them with banned medical substances, intentionally cheat with their wife while dressed in sporting attire etc.

    Leave a comment:


  • JustKeepSwimming
    replied
    That ban isn't long enough. Any intentional cheating in sport really should be a lifetime ban.

    It's greyer when it's substance abuse, as there have been incidents where I genuinely believe it was unintentional, like taking medicine that contained a banned substance.

    Leave a comment:


  • ladymuck
    replied
    What complete nonsense, who "accidentally" accepts a trophy? So she pulled out of the race and then hung around at the end to collect a prize? Yeah, pull the other one.

    Leave a comment:


  • jamesbrown
    replied
    It's like that time MF blamed the gimp suit in his dungeon on randy mice.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    started a topic Cheat!

    Cheat!

    For some reason I find this amusing - like she wouldn't be noticed....
    https://www.theguardian.com/sport/20...race-athletics

    A leading British ultra-marathon runner has been banned for 12 months by a UK Athletics disciplinary panel for using a car during a 50-mile race and then accepting a trophy for third place.
    Joasia Zakrzewski admitted that she had jumped into her friend’s vehicle during the 2023 GB Ultras Manchester to Liverpool race on 7 April, but claimed she only did so after telling marshalls that she was injured and was no longer competing.

    The 47-year-old, who finished 14th in the 2014 Commonwealth Games marathon and set a new world 48-hour distance record of 255.668 miles in February, had also denied deliberately cheating. Instead, she said that arriving from Australia the night before had left her unable to think straight, and had led to her wrongly accepting a trophy at the end of the race.

    However, that explanation was rejected by a UKA disciplinary panel who have now banned Zakrzewski from competing in any UKA licensed races, representing Great Britain, or coaching or managing for a year, after finding her guilty of breaching the UKA code of conduct for senior athletes.

    In a written decision, the panel said that Zakrzewski’s claims were “contrary to the evidence of the marshals, evidence which the respondent did not seek to challenge or contest, by way of cross-examination at the hearing”.

    Evidence showed that Zakrzewski – who has competed for GB numerous times in ultra-distance events, won multiple world 100km medals, and managed GB teams – had travelled around 2.5 miles in a car. According to GPS data, one of those miles was covered in one minute and 40 seconds.

Working...
X