- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Families at war
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Families at war"
Collapse
-
Families at war
Yeah the house price is included
https://metro.co.uk/2023/03/20/famil...tage-18469577/
A feuding family has racked up a £1 million legal bill in a raging dispute over a renovated cottage.
Pamela Teasdale, 68, told her husband, Daniel, 73, she wanted to divorce him after 44 years of marriage – leading to a tense four-year legal battle which ‘fractured’ the family.
The mum-of-two wanted to continue to live at Burne Farm in Todwick, South Yorkshire, in order to start a livery business, MailOnline reports.
This is despite Mr Teasdale’s family having run the farm for three generations, and offering Ms Teasdale a lump sum payoff.
But it was a recently renovated barn their daughter Rebecca Carter, 45, lived in with her husband and daughter that lead to major complications.
Both parents were happy for their daughter and her family to stay at Cow House cottage, which had undergone a major £200,000 revamp.
A row was sparked as Mr and Ms Teasdale and their daughter argued over who could claim legal ownership of the home.
Mrs Carter said she had been paying the mortgage for years, but her mum insisted it was just rent.
The argument became so bitter Ms Teasdale accused her own daughter of planting a listening device in her lounge.
Judge Gordon Shelton said it was a ‘tragedy’ no amicable agreement was reached, and it was ‘one of the most regrettable pieces of litigation he had ever come across’.
A nine-day High Court hearing followed by a two-day appeal hearing, with all three family members represented by expensive legal teams, led to a total legal bill of £1,048,000.
Judge Shelton, backed by the appeal judge Mr Justice Moor, ruled the parents promised the cottage to their daughter.
However, they refused Mrs Carter’s bid to stop her mum’s future livery business because it would ‘disturb their peace’.
The couple remain living under the same roof, with their daughter and her family also on the farming property.
It is still undecided who shall live where.
Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- HMRC loan charge settlement offer: 3 things to check before you sign Today 07:41
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Jul 31 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29

Leave a comment: