• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "We are all criminal suspects!"

Collapse

  • XLMonkey
    replied
    Originally posted by PRC1964
    It does if you're not a criminal
    Yep, didn't work to start, but then I went out and mugged an old lady. Now it works fine.

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    Originally posted by Lucifer Box
    Oh yes, and with a friendly reminder that if you speak to anyone about it some child porn will miraculously appear on your PC.

    True story: friend of mine was implicated sideways in a minor fraud committed by a friend of his. They were sharing a house at the time and when the old bill dawn raided the place they seized all his kit, a major bummer for him as he was running a hosting company. Anyways, after three months or so he got all of it back apart from one laptop which they alleged had child porn on it.

    He was charged and bailed - could not go within 500 yards of children, not allowed access to PCs (again, a major bummer for him) and ended up living with his parents as they had a place in the country. Destroyed his livelihood. Only when it got to court a year later was it noticed that the creation dates of all the alleged files were AFTER the laptop was seized by the police. Funnily, the police pushed him very strongly beforehand to plead guilty as otherwise his name would be in all the papers, his neighbours would find out, etc., etc.
    Yes, a well known police tactic. There are software that will change time-stamps also if you take the PC/Laptop off line or off the LAN you can rest the date time to whatever you want and save files accordingly. (Very handy for you project work)

    I have been to court cases where people I know have been stitched up by the police to the extent that evidence had been planted. What amazes me is that evidence has been planted in such a ridiculous manner the judges tend to go along with it. However, I did attend one appeal where a very clever barrister employed an ex-policemen to investigate the evidence in the case. When in court the case got to the stage that he was proving that evidence was planted; the police along with the CID inspectors walked out of court. Five minutes afterwards the Judge called a hold to the case and dismissed the case for the prosecution. There was no hint what so ever of the Police being prosecuted for prudery or perverting the cause of justice.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lucifer Box
    replied
    Originally posted by Euro-commuter
    Without an apology, more likely.
    Oh yes, and with a friendly reminder that if you speak to anyone about it some child porn will miraculously appear on your PC.

    True story: friend of mine was implicated sideways in a minor fraud committed by a friend of his. They were sharing a house at the time and when the old bill dawn raided the place they seized all his kit, a major bummer for him as he was running a hosting company. Anyways, after three months or so he got all of it back apart from one laptop which they alleged had child porn on it.

    He was charged and bailed - could not go within 500 yards of children, not allowed access to PCs (again, a major bummer for him) and ended up living with his parents as they had a place in the country. Destroyed his livelihood. Only when it got to court a year later was it noticed that the creation dates of all the alleged files were AFTER the laptop was seized by the police. Funnily, the police pushed him very strongly beforehand to plead guilty as otherwise his name would be in all the papers, his neighbours would find out, etc., etc.

    Leave a comment:


  • HairyArsedBloke
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn
    ... i've strangled the odd prostitute doesn't make me a fecking criminal!

    Yeah, that's what I said when they came for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • Euro-commuter
    replied
    Originally posted by Paddy
    Fine, wonderful. However fingerprints are not 100% proof and there are many near matches. Imagine you apply for identity card and you had a near mach to a criminal or terrorist. You are arrested taken away and a few weeks latter you are released with an apology.
    Without an apology, more likely.

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by oraclesmith
    Do Daleks have fingerprints? I seem to remember the animate bit was no more than a small parcel of mixed offal.
    And very tasty it was too!

    Leave a comment:


  • oraclesmith
    replied
    Do Daleks have fingerprints? I seem to remember the animate bit was no more than a small parcel of mixed offal.

    Leave a comment:


  • A shed load of Daleks
    replied
    Originally posted by Paddy
    Fine, wonderful. However fingerprints are not 100% proof and there are many near matches. Imagine you apply for identity card and you had a near mach to a criminal or terrorist. You are arrested taken away and a few weeks latter you are released with an apology.

    Going on about "it doesn’t matter if you have nothing to hide and a few innocent people sent to prison" doesn’t matter if it gets the majority of criminal off the streets is a great opinion until it is you who has been taken away.
    Like most contentious legislation get it on the books with least resistance and then expand - expect to see the fingerprint requirement replaced with fingerprint & drop of blood for DNA database post implementation

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Fcuking outrageous!

    Just because I don't pay any taxes and i've strangled the odd prostitute doesn't make me a fecking criminal!

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    Originally posted by hugebrain
    Surely the advantage of this isn't just that you can check the previous crimes against the database of fingerprints. More importantly, once you have the database you can add the fingerprints of your choice to any future crime scene. This should enable the police to reach their conviction targets much more easily.
    Fine, wonderful. However fingerprints are not 100% proof and there are many near matches. Imagine you apply for identity card and you had a near mach to a criminal or terrorist. You are arrested taken away and a few weeks latter you are released with an apology.

    Going on about "it doesn’t matter if you have nothing to hide and a few innocent people sent to prison" doesn’t matter if it gets the majority of criminal off the streets is a great opinion until it is you who has been taken away.

    Leave a comment:


  • hugebrain
    replied
    an advantage

    Originally posted by Paddy
    Surely the advantage of this isn't just that you can check the previous crimes against the database of fingerprints. More importantly, once you have the database you can add the fingerprints of your choice to any future crime scene. This should enable the police to reach their conviction targets much more easily.

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    Works now. Sorry

    Leave a comment:


  • PRC1964
    replied
    Originally posted by Moose423956
    The link doesn't work.
    It does if you're not a criminal

    Leave a comment:


  • Moose423956
    replied
    The link doesn't work.

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    started a topic We are all criminal suspects!

    We are all criminal suspects!

    We are all criminal suspects!

Working...
X