Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Feeling bored? Try your hand at this problem"
There are loads of maths problems that look (potentially) completely trivial but which have never been solved, despite considerable effort over the years and even centuries and millennia. It's all the more amazing when one thinks of the many subtle and intricate problems that have been solved, sometimes a long while ago.
One example that comes to mind is the Union Closed Conjecture. Denote a set by curly brackets, as in python, so for example { 1, 2 } is the set comprising as its elements the integers 1 and 2. A set can also comprise other sets, such as { {3, 4}, { }, {1} } (where that example includes the empty set as an element). By definition, a set cannot contain repeated elements.
The union-closed conjecture states that for every finite set of sets, with at least one non-empty and such that the union of any pair of sets is also in the set, at least one element in the sets must be present in at least half of them.
Sounds potty, and absolutely plausible, but hasn't been proved to this day.
Leave a comment: