• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Finally proper regime"

Collapse

  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    And how many of them would say so if it was THEM going to the Big House?
    I took part in that survey....


    I said it wasn't harsh enough then left a comment that they should all be put in stocks and have rotten food thrown at them

    I was thinking of a certain male poster who likes to go on holiday when I was filling it in....

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by ladymuck View Post
    Daily Question | 10/02/2021 | YouGov

    51% of people who took part in the YouGov survey thought 10 years was 'about right' and a further 13% thought it wasn't harsh enough.
    And how many of them would say so if it was THEM going to the Big House?

    Leave a comment:


  • ladymuck
    replied
    Well here's a follow up for you (I can't be bothered to find the original thread)

    Daily Question | 10/02/2021 | YouGov

    51% of people who took part in the YouGov survey thought 10 years was 'about right' and a further 13% thought it wasn't harsh enough.

    You can play with the graph to see the breakdown by region, age, politics etc.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Covid-19: Starmer says 10-year jail term for travel lies '''empty threat''' - BBC News

    oh btw - the Official threads get follow ups, they are maintained better than an average non-official copycat thread!

    So there.
    FFS haven't you learnt anything?

    You start threats about random tulip and other posters pile on..

    I suspect your next official thread is about glue girl.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Covid-19: Starmer says 10-year jail term for travel lies '''empty threat''' - BBC News

    oh btw - the Official threads get follow ups, they are maintained better than an average non-official copycat thread!

    So there.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Ten-year sentences for Covid rule-breaking 'utterly ridiculous' | World news | The Guardian

    That did not take long...

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    You got that right

    Leave a comment:


  • ladymuck
    replied
    KUATB

    https://www.contractoruk.com/forums/...been-busy.html

    [AtW] Oh but this is the offical thread [/AtW]

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    started a topic Finally proper regime

    Finally proper regime

    “ Travellers who try to conceal their arrival from a 'red list' country face jail sentences of up to 10 years under a new enforcement regime for quarantine hotels.

    Matt Hancock, the Health Secretary, also announced that anyone who tries to avoid the mandatory self-isolation in a hotel will face fines of up to £10,000.

    The new fines will also enforce a triple testing system for all arrivals whether they quarantine for 10 days in Government-approved hotels or at home.

    There will be a £1,000 penalty for any international arrival who fails to take a mandatory test either within 72 hours of departure or on the second day of quarantine and a £2,000 penalty for any international arrival who fails to take the second mandatory test on day eight.

    Any failure to be tested will also automatically extend the errant travellers’ quarantine period to 14 days. It is thought this comes on top of the £1,000 fine for failing to quarantine at home.”

    Passengers face up to 10 years in jail for concealing 'red list' travel

    Tough talk, all they need now is get more police to catch violators, more barristers to defend them in court, more courts and a lot more jails...

Working...
X