Originally posted by mattster
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Past Covid-19 infection may provide 'months of immunity'"
Collapse
-
Healthcare setting - higher risk of getting a load of Covid from coughing patient, immune system can only handle so much
-
Low mortality? With all the lockdowns UK got biggest loss since WW2 -Originally posted by mattster View PostThat, and the low mortality figure, and especially the fact that risk of death was to tightly confined to a specific demograpphic.
Covid: 2020 saw most excess deaths since World War Two - BBC News
Moot point anyway - people who run countries are old, so this virus is taken seriously (unlike swine flu pandemic which mostly affected young)
Leave a comment:
-
OK, well that actually is quite interesting. 83% after 9 months doesn't sound too spectacular to me, though.Originally posted by AtW View PostThat figure comes from actual study (hint: it involved tests) -
“ From June to November 2020, almost 21,000 healthcare workers across the UK were regularly tested to see whether they:
currently had the coronavirus
had had it previously”
Leave a comment:
-
That, and the low mortality figure, and especially the fact that risk of death was to tightly confined to a specific demograpphic. If this thing was killing 10% (SARS1) or 30% (MERS) across the board, we would have shut our borders and never have come out of the first lockdown until it had been eradicated.Originally posted by AtW View PostThat I believe - asymptomatic spread is one big reason Sars2 was so successful (in virus terms)
Leave a comment:
-
That figure comes from actual study (hint: it involved tests) -Originally posted by mattster View PostWe have no real idea how many people are getting reinfected, because it requires a proper test during both infections - neither of which is likely, especially first wave, when a very small percentage actually tested +ve. This effect could be compounded if the second infection is much milder than the first, due to some residual immunity - but you might still be able to spread it the second time around.
“ From June to November 2020, almost 21,000 healthcare workers across the UK were regularly tested to see whether they:
currently had the coronavirus
had had it previously”
Leave a comment:
-
Exactly, which directly contradicts this point:Originally posted by AtW View PostSome people claim all sort of things
No proof== no valid claim
We have no real idea how many people are getting reinfected, because it requires a proper test during both infections - neither of which is likely, especially first wave, when a very small percentage actually tested +ve. This effect could be compounded if the second infection is much milder than the first, due to some residual immunity - but you might still be able to spread it the second time around.Originally posted by AtW83% is interesting figure, but if it was that low we’d have a lot more reports by now with re-infected people - been 9 months since plenty of infections in the UK.
Leave a comment:
-
Yeah I enjoy telling them -Originally posted by AtW View PostSome people claim all sort of things
No proof== no valid claim
I do know a couple of people who have had Covid but didn't know. They have had antibody tests. They are freaked out by it as they could have infected a fair few people.
Leave a comment:
-
Some people are claiming they have been reinfected as in late 2020/around now as they have had the same symptoms as in early 2020 but they couldn't get a test then but now they have tested positive.Originally posted by AtW View Post
83% is interesting figure, but if it was that low we’d have a lot more reports by now with re-infected people - been 9 months since plenty of infections in the UK.
Mybe just maybe immunity from Covid lasts much longer (not the same as still getting virus and passing it on)
Leave a comment:
-
Past Covid-19 infection may provide 'months of immunity'
“Most people who have had Covid-19 are protected from catching it again for at least five months, a study led by Public Health England shows.
Past infection was linked to an 83% lower risk of getting the virus, compared with those who had never had Covid-19, scientists found.
But experts warn some people do catch Covid-19 again - and can infect others.
And officials stress people should follow the stay-at-home rules - whether or not they have had the virus.”
Past Covid-19 infection may provide '''months of immunity''' - BBC News
83% is interesting figure, but if it was that low we’d have a lot more reports by now with re-infected people - been 9 months since plenty of infections in the UK.
Mybe just maybe immunity from Covid lasts much longer (not the same as still getting virus and passing it on)Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Leave a comment: