• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "DOOM: Covid-19: Oxford University vaccine shows 70% protection"

Collapse

  • minestrone
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    He really ought to be keeping his mouth shut as otherwise he just invites vaccine hesitancy.

    In a few months there will be enough evidence of how many vaccinated people get infected as % of total given each vaccine, this might look very bad for them if it is still 60% efficacy vs 95% mRNA

    On the other hand it’s hard cases that matter, we will see soon
    Fookin looser ethnicity.

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    So 70% is what's normally expected from normal flu vaccines, which is why mRNA results were surprisingly better and the real funny part is that Russian "vaccine" was claimed to be 92% effective after Pfizer released data of 90%+, the fun part being is that Russian "vaccine" is also based on adenovirus (only human, rather than garden monkey variety), so it seems more likely that its efficiency is likely to be in 70% region, which kind of re-inforces the obvious - Russian Govt are pathological liars, just like Trump and Boris.

    Hail Great Leader Put1n!
    Can you fix broken wrists in a theatre of war?

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    He really ought to be keeping his mouth shut as otherwise he just invites vaccine hesitancy.

    In a few months there will be enough evidence of how many vaccinated people get infected as % of total given each vaccine, this might look very bad for them if it is still 60% efficacy vs 95% mRNA

    On the other hand it’s hard cases that matter, we will see soon
    Last edited by AtW; 27 December 2020, 09:17.

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Looks like the Oxford / AstraZeneca will be certified on Monday after all the trials and tribualtions it has been through however the latest statement by their chief executive still doesn't fill me with confidence:

    “We think we’ve figured out the winning formula to maximise the protection offered”
    I would rather hear 'we know' than 'we think'

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    It will still be ok for the 3rd world ( but unlikely good enough to allow international travel).
    Perfect for Brexiteers!

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by saptastic View Post
    so what's actually happened to this vaccine? Its all gone quiet. Can we cancel the 30m orders?
    The paperwork has been submitted to the regulator.

    UK prepares for decision on AZ/Oxford vaccine as COVID cases soar -

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by saptastic View Post
    so what's actually happened to this vaccine? Its all gone quiet. Can we cancel the 30m orders?
    It will still be ok for the 3rd world ( but unlikely good enough to allow international travel).

    Orders are past 30 days cooling off period, so no.

    Leave a comment:


  • saptastic
    replied
    so what's actually happened to this vaccine? Its all gone quiet. Can we cancel the 30m orders?

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    "Trusting their own test results, the Oxford trial team was granted permission by the regulator MHRA to reduce the dose of the vaccine injected into participants from this batch.

    However, Reuters have reported that from documents published in The Lancet journal show that Oxford researchers had made an error in their testing.

    IRBM/Advent told the news agency that the measuring mishap was “the result of a change in the testing method.”

    The Lancet documents showed that a common emulsifier had been used in the mixing of the vaccine which meant it interfered with the ultraviolet-light meter used by the institution to test its strength.

    As a result, the participants in the trial received a much lower dose of the vaccine when Oxford scientists believed they were administering full doses.

    The half doses when followed up with another full dose booster, were 90 per cent effective and much higher than the 62 per cent of the two full doses, despite not being tested on anyone over-55."

    Oxford vaccine mix up came from scientists misreading the strength of Italian manufacturers' supply

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Different age groups may get different Covid vaccines, experts say | Science | The Guardian

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    Which is fine for everyone 18-55 and what we want.
    Anti-vaxxers will have a field day pointing out to mistakes in the trial and calling into question the whole thing, especially pointing out that they use chimps' adenovirus.

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Ageist
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    Which is fine for everyone 18-55 and what we want.
    Sent from my 5g carrier pigeon

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    They've been manufacturing it for some time, that's (likely to be) going to be the first vaccine available in the UK en mass.
    Which is fine for everyone 18-55 and what we want.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    Lucky the UK has bought some of the other ones then. The elderly will be first in line, and the Oxford one isn't ready yet anyway.
    They've been manufacturing it for some time, that's (likely to be) going to be the first vaccine available in the UK en mass.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Lucky the UK has bought some of the other ones then. The elderly will be first in line, and the Oxford one isn't ready yet anyway.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X