• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: DOOM: Stonehenge

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "DOOM: Stonehenge"

Collapse

  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by Paddy View Post

    They could build a flyover much cheaper and use the existing stones as support.


    Mind you, Newgrange in Country Meath would make a great spot for a multi-lane motorway roundabout!

    Seriously, I think a long tunnel is a great idea, as long as it is bored, rather than "cut and cover", which would obviously destroy every archaeological artifact in its path, and provided they do extensive excavations first around the entry and exit, because one reason Stonehenge was originally built was the presence of nearby springs at Blick Mead not far from the present A303.
    Last edited by OwlHoot; 13 November 2020, 00:16.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by Paddy View Post
    They could build a flyover much cheaper and use the existing stones as support.
    FREE homeless* shelter under the bridge too?


    * trolls only

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    They could build a flyover much cheaper and use the existing stones as support.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by xoggoth View Post
    I bet some were calling Stonehenge a 2 billion white elephant 3000 years ago.
    I bet 5 small white stones that back 3000 years ago they knew how to deal with people objecting to major infrastructure projects...

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    I bet some were calling Stonehenge a 2 billion white elephant 3000 years ago.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    started a topic DOOM: Stonehenge

    DOOM: Stonehenge

    "Some environmentalists and archaeologists had voiced their opposition to the plan due to its potential impact on the area.

    Tom Holland, from the Stonehenge Alliance, said the scheme was "a £2 billion white elephant" and called the decision "shocking and shameful".

    "The decision to inject a great gash of tarmac and concrete into Britain's most precious prehistoric landscape is one that ranks simultaneously as spendthrift and sacrilegious," he said.

    "This has huge implications not just for Britain, but for the entire world. What's to stop people at Giza (site of the pyramids), or in Rwanda getting rid of gorillas because they're in the way of mining developments?."

    Cas Smith, a druid and anti-tunnel campaigner, said it was a "complete violation".

    "You wouldn't dream of pushing a bore tunnel next door to Salisbury Cathedral, so why Stonehenge," she said."

    Source: Stonehenge A303 tunnel plan approved by transport secretary - BBC News

    Christians won, get over it druids!

Working...
X