• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Who on here was it..."

Collapse

  • LondonManc
    replied
    Was he called Bobby Tables?

    Leave a comment:


  • Andy2
    replied
    how did he even register the company name.
    I would expect it would have crashed companies house or hmrc database

    Leave a comment:


  • BR14
    replied
    Originally posted by xoggoth View Post
    Nick Fitz is the obvious suspect.
    Grass.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Nah, he got an alibi - he was under lock down...

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    Nick Fitz is the obvious suspect.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    started a topic Who on here was it...

    Who on here was it...

    “ Companies House has forced a company to change its name after it belatedly realised it could pose a security risk.

    The company now legally known as “THAT COMPANY WHOSE NAME USED TO CONTAIN HTML SCRIPT TAGS LTD” was set up by a British software engineer, who says he did it purely because he thought it would be “a fun playful name” for his consulting business.

    He now says he didn’t realise that Companies House was actually vulnerable to the extremely simple technique he used, known as “cross-site scripting”, which allows an attacker to run code from one website on another.

    The original name of the company was ““><SCRIPT SRC=HTTPS://MJT.XSS.HT> LTD”. By beginning the name with a quotation mark and chevron, any site which failed to properly handle the HTML code would have mistakenly thought the company name was blank, and then loaded and executed a script from the site XSS Hunter, which helps developers find cross-site scripting errors.”

    Company forced to change name that could be used to hack websites | UK news | The Guardian

    That looks so Brilloant...

Working...
X