• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Birth Control

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Birth Control"

Collapse

  • minestrone
    replied
    Dont think they really execute that many people these days. 14 this year, 2 black. I would imagine that their crimes were really feckin bad.

    Leave a comment:


  • hairymouse
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    She is against both. The point is the lefties are only getting upset about the former and conveniently ignoring the latter. So, on the one hand, she'll probably tend to measures that tighten abortion law, but on the other hand, she'll also tend to measures that restrict the death penalty.

    Some Christians view life as sacrosanct, but that doesn't preclude being a soldier, nor does it immediately mean being against a state sanctioned death penalty. The biggest issue with the US system is not in my view the death penalty per se (although I think it should be abolished), rather the sheer numbers on death row, the number of very doubtful convictions - and the demographic of those on death row.
    Don't forget that recent changes to the way lethal injection is administered has made it a terrifying and cruel way to die. IMHO, sane people can disagree about the death penalty but nobody should agree with torturing someone to death.

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    It is jaw dropping watching Dianne Feinstein use a "you can't serve the Pope and America" derivative.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    I never understand that. If you are a Christian against abortion then you should be against the death penalty. Otherwise you don't view all life as sacrosanct.
    She is against both. The point is the lefties are only getting upset about the former and conveniently ignoring the latter. So, on the one hand, she'll probably tend to measures that tighten abortion law, but on the other hand, she'll also tend to measures that restrict the death penalty.

    Some Christians view life as sacrosanct, but that doesn't preclude being a soldier, nor does it immediately mean being against a state sanctioned death penalty. The biggest issue with the US system is not in my view the death penalty per se (although I think it should be abolished), rather the sheer numbers on death row, the number of very doubtful convictions - and the demographic of those on death row.

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
    “(Catholic judges) are obliged by oath, professional commitment, and the demands of citizenship to enforce the death penalty. They are also obliged to adhere to their church’s teaching on moral matters.” — 1998 article co-written by Barrett in the Marquette Law Review on how some Catholic judges would feel torn on certain legal questions because of the teachings of their faith.

    “Never. It’s never appropriate for a judge to impose that judge’s personal convictions, whether they derive from faith or anywhere else on the law.” — 2017 confirmation hearing.


    The Mogg was right in his approach, no messing about, right in with his opinion and no apologies for having them. Acknowledged the country wasn't religious so his views weren't shared.

    The Tim Farron approach finished his career.

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    “(Catholic judges) are obliged by oath, professional commitment, and the demands of citizenship to enforce the death penalty. They are also obliged to adhere to their church’s teaching on moral matters.” — 1998 article co-written by Barrett in the Marquette Law Review on how some Catholic judges would feel torn on certain legal questions because of the teachings of their faith.

    “Never. It’s never appropriate for a judge to impose that judge’s personal convictions, whether they derive from faith or anywhere else on the law.” — 2017 confirmation hearing.


    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    Most Christian politicians are pragmatic, they just want it done early in the term and not be the only outcome discussed. Of course it will be framed that she wants to ban abortion which I doubt is the case.

    This whole discussion is gold for Trump, more catholic votes in Texas and Florida.

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    I never understand that. If you are a Christian against abortion then you should be against the death penalty. Otherwise you don't view all life as sacrosanct.
    Logic is not these people's strong point.

    Just down from my office is a clinic which provides these services and these people stand outside all day, every day:

    Bishop Burbidge leads prayer outside Falls Church abortion clinic - The Arlington Catholic Herald

    Police investigate bomb scares at Virginia abortion clinic | WSET

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    She's (predictably) anti-abortion. This, some feel, puts here beyond the pale, even though she says she doesn't let personal opinion rule in the courts. But they don't say anything about her being personally against the death penalty.
    I never understand that. If you are a Christian against abortion then you should be against the death penalty. Otherwise you don't view all life as sacrosanct.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    She's (predictably) anti-abortion. This, some feel, puts here beyond the pale, even though she says she doesn't let personal opinion rule in the courts. But they don't say anything about her being personally against the death penalty.

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    IF you got pulled up for serious tulip in convent school you were asked to explain, "what would God say about you sinning?" WASPs probably just got belted but fenians had to get a plan.

    Leave a comment:


  • ravenshaw
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    started a topic Birth Control

    Birth Control

    Roman Catholics account for a bit more than 20% of the U.S. population, yet they are on track to hold six of the Supreme Court’s nine seats now that President Donald Trump is expected to nominate Amy Coney Barrett to fill its vacancy.
    If Barrett joins, Supreme Court would have six Catholics

Working...
X