• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Scientific study on virtue and victim signalling"

Collapse

  • Jog On
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Oh wow, propaganda outlet that does not lie 100% of the time?

    Joseph Goebbels done it - he had at least one radio that pretended to be opposition and told the truth substantial amount of time, but when and where it mattered they repeated lies for Nazi propaganda machine, people who listened in believe it - and to be fair I'd excuse them because back then they did not have the Internet and it was probably the only "opposition" radio that they were allowed to listen in.

    Which is what makes current situation pretty shocking - truth is one click away, but Mor Ons like you CHOOSE to believe propaganda outlets like RT, ZH.
    As long as we have you to point us to the truth we'll make it.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by Jog On View Post
    Which is it? If anything this is an example that you've confirmed that ZH are reprinting something factual.
    Oh wow, propaganda outlet that does not lie 100% of the time?

    Joseph Goebbels done it - he had at least one radio that pretended to be opposition and told the truth substantial amount of time, but when and where it mattered they repeated lies for Nazi propaganda machine, people who listened in believe it - and to be fair I'd excuse them because back then they did not have the Internet and it was probably the only "opposition" radio that they were allowed to listen in.

    Which is what makes current situation pretty shocking - truth is one click away, but Mor Ons like you CHOOSE to believe propaganda outlets like RT, ZH.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jog On
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    PDF yes, but not the (brainwashing?) article which is on different (affiliated with ZH?) site, despite you having read it on ZH in the first place.

    Anything posted on ZH should be viewed as the material products by Reichsministerium für Volksaufklärung und Propaganda, 11-13 ulitsa Bol. Lubyanka, Moscow, 666666
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Here are the facts -

    1. You consumed your usual portion of lies on ZH

    2. Knowing full well that ZH is regarded as fake news propaganda site you’ve linked to 3rd party site “reason.com” to spread ZH propaganda under disguise

    What a shocking surprise!
    Which is it? If anything this is an example that you've confirmed that ZH are reprinting something factual.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Here are the facts -

    1. You consumed your usual portion of lies on ZH

    2. Knowing full well that ZH is regarded as fake news propaganda site you’ve linked to 3rd party site “reason.com” to spread ZH propaganda under disguise

    What a shocking surprise!

    Leave a comment:


  • Jog On
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    What I am saying is that if ZH posted about it and where you've read about it in the first place (by your own admission) then have some balls to post link to ZH rather than some other "3rd party" site which is probably linked to ZH fed propaganda.

    Not going to waste my time reading anything connected to ZH - which is why they are now trying to bypass their toxic image using 3rd party sites like the one you've referenced.
    ZH reprinted the article from the original site and didn't create any of the content in the article. This is something they do a lot and have for quite a long time.

    The PDF and what the scientific study and actual content (which you've confirmed is credible) is what matters. Where I read it is irrelevant. You read the femail section of the DM - does that mean that the news articles you post about are 'disinfo'?

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by Jog On View Post
    Thanks for clearing that up. So it's not 'disinfo' then. Are you saying that the accompanying article is 'disonfo' and can you back this up?
    What I am saying is that if ZH posted about it and where you've read about it in the first place (by your own admission) then have some balls to post link to ZH rather than some other "3rd party" site which is probably linked to ZH fed propaganda.

    Not going to waste my time reading anything connected to ZH - which is why they are now trying to bypass their toxic image using 3rd party sites like the one you've referenced.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jog On
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    PDF yes
    Thanks for clearing that up. So it's not 'disinfo' then. Are you saying that the accompanying article is 'disonfo' and can you back this up?

    Leave a comment:


  • BlasterBates
    replied
    Good post, very relevant

    Trump victim signalling

    President Donald Trump presented himself as a victim during Thursday's press conference on coronavirus, complaining the media has not treated him "fairly."
    Johnson, Rees Mogg, Farage and co have also done a lot of victim signalling. It seems to be the a core plank of modern politics.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by Jog On View Post
    Eh I did - I posted the source that ZH quoted.
    PDF yes, but not the (brainwashing?) article which is on different (affiliated with ZH?) site, despite you having read it on ZH in the first place.

    Anything posted on ZH should be viewed as the material products by Reichsministerium für Volksaufklärung und Propaganda, 11-13 ulitsa Bol. Lubyanka, Moscow, 666666

    Leave a comment:


  • Jog On
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    So why didn't you quote the original source?



    Here is my educated guess - both ZH and useful Mor Ons like you now know that quoting ZH is like quoting Reichsministerium für Volksaufklärung und Propaganda, so same disinfo designed to influence weak minds gets posted somewhere else and make it easier for people like you to share.

    Permbans are well overdue for ZH sourced content.
    Eh I did - I posted the source that ZH quoted. They just reprinted the article from the source I quoted.

    Now it's your turn to prove that this scientific study is 'disinfo'

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by Jog On View Post
    Yes I did originally see it on ZH - so what? Does that make it 'fake news'?
    So why didn't you quote the original source?



    Here is my educated guess - both ZH and useful Mor Ons like you now know that quoting ZH is like quoting Reichsministerium für Volksaufklärung und Propaganda, so same disinfo designed to influence weak minds gets posted somewhere else and make it easier for people like you to share.

    Permbans are well overdue for ZH sourced content.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jog On
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    URL from ZH:
    /markets/narcissists-psychopaths-manipulators-are-more-likely-engage-virtuous-victim-signaling-study

    URL from "reason.com":
    /2020/07/07/narcissists-psychopaths-and-manipulators-are-more-likely-to-engage-in-virtuous-victim-signaling-says-study/

    Coincidental close naming with just slight changes? I think not.
    Yes I did originally see it on ZH - so what? Does that make it 'fake news'?

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    URL from ZH:
    /markets/narcissists-psychopaths-manipulators-are-more-likely-engage-virtuous-victim-signaling-study

    URL from "reason.com":
    /2020/07/07/narcissists-psychopaths-and-manipulators-are-more-likely-to-engage-in-virtuous-victim-signaling-says-study/

    Coincidental close naming with just slight changes? I think not.

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    No RT or ZH links???
    Anything for you AtW, because we know how much you love ZeroHedge

    Narcissists, Psychopaths, & Manipulators Are More Likely To Engage In "Virtuous Victim Signaling", Study Finds | Zero Hedge

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    Liberals tend to talk to minorities like they are idiots...

    APA PsycNet

    "do. you. understand. me? I. am. trying. to. help. you."

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X