Reply to: 92 year old grannys matter

[Old Greg]

That wouldn't fit the Democrat rhetoric.

After all, they introduced the Jim Crow laws, despite them being something you'd expect Republicans to introduce. They don't like talking about that either though.

You would only expect the Republicans to have introduced them if you know little about US political history.

[LondonManc]

you do know that 93% of black homicides in the USA are perpetrated by other black people

seems odd that the focus is not on reducing these huge numbers, again maybe it doesnt fit with the agenda

sad really sad, you people want to have a long hard look in the mirror

That wouldn't fit the Democrat rhetoric.

After all, they introduced the Jim Crow laws, despite them being something you'd expect Republicans to introduce. They don't like talking about that either though.

[mrdonuts]

you do know that 93% of black homicides in the USA are perpetrated by other black people

seems odd that the focus is not on reducing these huge numbers, again maybe it doesnt fit with the agenda

sad really sad, you people want to have a long hard look in the mirror

[Old Greg]

Bit difficult to arrange a vigil for her she is too terrified to want to be identified!

Where is the difficulty in arranging a vigil for someone whose name you don't know?

[Old Greg]

Apologies it was poetic expression. You had already decided their guilt and were demanding justice before trial a lot like cowboy lynching party. You may not have recognised your behaviour as those in such parties frequently believe they are serving the law.

So do you concede Homicide is not the same as murder and and the mE's ruling just states the fact that someone died at the hand of another? I am able to do so, it also reinforces my point that its not over until the Judge / Jury return a verdict. You seem to think it confers guilt.

So you're a liar, but too dishonest to admit it. What a surprise. Show me where I was demanding justice before a trial. I was advocating justice, and a trial is part of the judicial process.

I've never said homicide is the same as murder, so no need to concede anything.

[darmstadt]

Bit difficult to arrange a vigil for her she is too terrified to want to be identified!

You could do one for all OAPs that have been attacked:

Rapist caged for mugging OAP after following him home from lap-dancing club - Daily Record

301 Moved Permanently

OAP mugged in street

OAP mugged outside Sussex Place shops, Swindon police say | Swindon Advertiser

Mugging suspect nabbed in Windmill Street, Gravesend

https://www.scotsman.com/news/oap-mu...veside-1723022

And so on...

[vetran]

Please show me a post where I was starting the lynching parties, or admit that you are a liar.

Apologies it was poetic expression. You had already decided their guilt and were demanding justice before trial a lot like cowboy lynching party. You may not have recognised your behaviour as those in such parties frequently believe they are serving the law.

So do you concede Homicide is not the same as murder and and the mE's ruling just states the fact that someone died at the hand of another? I am able to do so, it also reinforces my point that its not over until the Judge / Jury return a verdict. You seem to think it confers guilt.

[vetran]

No Wikipedia page for that but: Urban Dictionary: All talk and no action

Bit difficult to arrange a vigil for her she is too terrified to want to be identified!

[Old Greg]

We do NOW have 2 autopsies saying it was in the ME's opinion Homicide. You were starting the lynching parties based on the video. You were certain the 4 cops were guilty of racially aggravated murder which has still not been proven, it won't be until the court case.


Basically the Autopsies have ruled out a sad accident or natural causes. but as they say:

Two autopsies both find George Floyd died by homicide, but differ on some key details - CBS News



Whilst you seem to think Homicide=Murder it doesn't, it covers both our Murder & Manslaughter.



It doesn't mean that by law anyone is guilty of intending to kill someone it could be considered negligence or recklessness in court.

Please show me a post where I was starting the lynching parties, or admit that you are a liar.

[vetran]

So you think that even with two autopsies saying that it was homicide, it's too early to jump to conclusions?

I do look forward to you arranging a demo or vigil in support of this lady, or are you all talk?

We do NOW have 2 autopsies saying it was in the ME's opinion Homicide. You were starting the lynching parties based on the video. You were certain the 4 cops were guilty of racially aggravated murder which has still not been proven, it won't be until the court case.


Basically the Autopsies have ruled out a sad accident or natural causes. but as they say:

Two autopsies both find George Floyd died by homicide, but differ on some key details - CBS News

But the report released later Monday by the Hennepin County Medical Examiner's office said Floyd died of "cardiopulmonary arrest complicating law enforcement subdual, restraint and neck compression." The manner of death was ruled homicide, but the office noted that "is not a legal determination of culpability or intent." A preliminary autopsy report cited earlier by prosecutors said the county medical examiner's review "revealed no physical findings that support a diagnosis of traumatic asphyxia or strangulation."

Whilst you seem to think Homicide=Murder it doesn't, it covers both our Murder & Manslaughter.

homicide/ˈhɒmɪsʌɪd/
Learn to pronounce




nounNORTH AMERICAN

[COLOR=#878787 !important][/COLOR]

• the killing of one person by another.
  [COLOR=#878787 !important]"he was charged with homicide"[/COLOR]
  
  
  
  
  
  

It doesn't mean that by law anyone is guilty of intending to kill someone it could be considered negligence or recklessness in court.

[darmstadt]

So you think that even with two autopsies saying that it was homicide, it's too early to jump to conclusions?

I do look forward to you arranging a demo or vigil in support of this lady, or are you all talk?

No Wikipedia page for that but: Urban Dictionary: All talk and no action

[Old Greg]

I will look forward to the court ruling on it and hopefully if they find him guilty they will either recommend he gets therapy as it seems he has a real mental issue or maybe a custodial sentence.

I do look forward to the famous supporting this lady as after years of this kind of thuggery many older people are terrified to go out.

So you think that even with two autopsies saying that it was homicide, it's too early to jump to conclusions?

I do look forward to you arranging a demo or vigil in support of this lady, or are you all talk?

[vetran]

As I've said, I think it's a terrible incident and the perpetrator should be severely punished. I'm just disappointed that people like you don't demand that we wait for due process before jumping to conclusions.

I will look forward to the court ruling on it and hopefully if they find him guilty they will either recommend he gets therapy as it seems he has a real mental issue or maybe a custodial sentence.

I do look forward to the famous supporting this lady as after years of this kind of thuggery many older people are terrified to go out.

[Old Greg]

seriously you are mocking this incident? How fecking sad are you??

A 31 year old man with 100 previous arrests knocks down a 92 year old and you use it to support your racist agenda?

As I've said, I think it's a terrible incident and the perpetrator should be severely punished. I'm just disappointed that people like you don't demand that we wait for due process before jumping to conclusions.

[vetran]

seriously you are mocking this incident? How fecking sad are you??

A 31 year old man with 100 previous arrests knocks down a 92 year old and you use it to support your racist agenda?