- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson has coronavirus"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by KinooOrKinog View PostThere is a motive. And if you're calling me names because you don't have an argument for what I've said then frankly that says more about you than it does about me.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by KinooOrKinog View PostThere is a motive. And if you're calling me names because you don't have an argument for what I've said then frankly that says more about you than it does about me.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SueEllen View PostNot all vulnerable people are old.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostIt does not make any sense - dumb fookwits just trying to explain fit what’s happening into supposedly clever plan, the really moronic part in this case is that there is no motive here, these fookwits just should be banned on sight
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Whorty View PostYou read too much conspiracy theory rubbish.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by KinooOrKinog View PostOk, so apparently the reason for all the restrictions is to protect the lives of the vulnerable. Yes? But since when did governments & the top 1% care about anything except money and power? They don't give a toss about old people.
They want to change the world economy & what they're doing now is a classic control tactic. They have a desired outcome & the way to get what they want is to introduce a problem which causes fear. Then they suggest a solution to that problem that gives them their desired outcome. The vast majority of the population are blind sheep who will refuse to see it.
They must be absolutely p1ssing themselves laughing at everyone scrambling about buying toilet rolls & clapping.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by KinooOrKinog View PostOk, so apparently the reason for all the restrictions is to protect the lives of the vulnerable. Yes? But since when did governments & the top 1% care about anything except money and power? They don't give a toss about old people.
They want to change the world economy & what they're doing now is a classic control tactic. They have a desired outcome & the way to get what they want is to introduce a problem which causes fear. Then they suggest a solution to that problem that gives them their desired outcome. The vast majority of the population are blind sheep who will refuse to see it.
They must be absolutely p1ssing themselves laughing at everyone scrambling about buying toilet rolls & clapping.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by KinooOrKinog View PostOk, so apparently the reason for all the restrictions is to protect the lives of the vulnerable. Yes? But since when did governments & the top 1% care about anything except money and power? They don't give a toss about old people.
They want to change the world economy & what they're doing now is a classic control tactic. They have a desired outcome & the way to get what they want is to introduce a problem which causes fear. Then they suggest a solution to that problem that gives them their desired outcome. The vast majority of the population are blind sheep who will refuse to see it.
They must be absolutely p1ssing themselves laughing at everyone scrambling about buying toilet rolls & clapping.
And while some maybe old they are very rich royalty who are in control of a government.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostSo world Govt wants to lose lots of money in sectors they control and have hundreds of millions unemployed (not serving said world govt)?
Pretty moronic motive.
They want to change the world economy & what they're doing now is a classic control tactic. They have a desired outcome & the way to get what they want is to introduce a problem which causes fear. Then they suggest a solution to that problem that gives them their desired outcome. The vast majority of the population are blind sheep who will refuse to see it.
They must be absolutely p1ssing themselves laughing at everyone scrambling about buying toilet rolls & clapping.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by KinooOrKinog View PostIt's been happening gradually for years. Phasing out cash, constant surveillance through tech, restrictions on speech. And now Gordon Brown has already suggested a 'temporary' global government.
I'm calling it now. This 'virus' will disappear as quickly as it appeared, but the restrictions we have in place to 'protect us' will not be rolled back.
Pretty moronic motive.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Scoobos View PostI fear for my balance, but if I believed this was a conspiracy or new world order tactic; I'd be fearing for my sanity. That's a bridge too far for me, I'm afraid.
I'm calling it now. This 'virus' will disappear as quickly as it appeared, but the restrictions we have in place to 'protect us' will not be rolled back.
Leave a comment:
-
I fear for my balance, but if I believed this was a conspiracy or new world order tactic; I'd be fearing for my sanity. That's a bridge too far for me, I'm afraid.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Scoobos View PostI'm really not believing they have it.. I'm also not accepting that I think this way, it's crackerjack.
But, it would just be ideal wouldn't it? They've made a few mistakes, got destroyed on QT , they are continuing to think we can have our cake and eat it, in regards to the economy and public health.
London already fears that Nightingale will effectively be a death camp, staffed by young doctors and retired NHS staff with no specific training , tulip PPE and , in the case of the retired are themselves are in the risk group.
Add to that, the ventilator manufacturer talking to BBC news on the radio on Friday saying that no orders have been made from him, why are they going to Dyson to invent something new, rather than help ramp up the production we already have at existing manufacturers, etc. (Penlon have been particularly outspoken on this).
It's pretty much given that we are only testing people on admission to hospital, and that 20% need hospitalisation. If this is accurate, our mortality rate is 1.28% , which isnt so bad .
It's easy for us to be critical of Trump's economy first strategy from over the pond, but I've always had a horrible suspicion since Trump effectively endorsed Boris for PM , that Boris is using the same play book, just a bit more tactfully.
If we are stil allowing flights in from NY to London now, with no testing, quarantine or anything combined with non-key workers being pressured to work and a rhetoric that 'we are starting to ramp up prodcution of PPE and ventilators' NOW ; we are not being looked after and the cracks will show.
We quarantine animals for rabies more strongly than we are people from the epicentre of the US outbreak.
Basically, if none of these people need hospitalisation, I'm calling BS. Please convince me otherwise as I feel like I'm going crackers!!
Leave a comment:
-
I'm really not believing they have it.. I'm also not accepting that I think this way, it's crackerjack.
But, it would just be ideal wouldn't it? They've made a few mistakes, got destroyed on QT , they are continuing to think we can have our cake and eat it, in regards to the economy and public health.
London already fears that Nightingale will effectively be a death camp, staffed by young doctors and retired NHS staff with no specific training , tulip PPE and , in the case of the retired are themselves are in the risk group.
Add to that, the ventilator manufacturer talking to BBC news on the radio on Friday saying that no orders have been made from him, why are they going to Dyson to invent something new, rather than help ramp up the production we already have at existing manufacturers, etc. (Penlon have been particularly outspoken on this).
It's pretty much given that we are only testing people on admission to hospital, and that 20% need hospitalisation. If this is accurate, our mortality rate is 1.28% , which isnt so bad .
It's easy for us to be critical of Trump's economy first strategy from over the pond, but I've always had a horrible suspicion since Trump effectively endorsed Boris for PM , that Boris is using the same play book, just a bit more tactfully.
If we are stil allowing flights in from NY to London now, with no testing, quarantine or anything combined with non-key workers being pressured to work and a rhetoric that 'we are starting to ramp up prodcution of PPE and ventilators' NOW ; we are not being looked after and the cracks will show.
We quarantine animals for rabies more strongly than we are people from the epicentre of the US outbreak.
Basically, if none of these people need hospitalisation, I'm calling BS. Please convince me otherwise as I feel like I'm going crackers!!Last edited by Scoobos; 29 March 2020, 14:22.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Yesterday 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
- How debt transfer rules will hit umbrella companies in 2026 Nov 12 09:28
- IT contractor demand floundering despite Autumn Budget 2024 Nov 11 09:30
- An IR35 bill of £19m for National Resources Wales may be just the tip of its iceberg Nov 7 09:20
Leave a comment: