Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Lord Chancellor Lord Falconer says the orders will not be an infringement on individual freedoms because there must be evidence before they are issued.
Does he realise what rubbish he is waffling about. How can there be evidence, if there has been no crime
Originally posted by Lord Falconer
If there's evidence that you could commit a violent offence in the future
What like thumping the next NL minister who thinks that we believe any rubbish they spout!
This on top of the jailing of mental patients for what they might do.
Mr Reid told the News of the World: "These ruthless criminals prey on innocent people and will stop at nothing to create a life of luxury for themselves while destroying the lives of hard-working people."
Leave a comment: