• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Should Prince Andrew still be HRH?"

Collapse

  • original PM
    replied
    Originally posted by Zigenare View Post
    Could it be that all the "evidence" is circumstantial? Or even non-extant?
    Well reading some info in the Sun (yes it was just the first search result which came up so not taking it as gospel link here Who is Virginia Roberts and what allegations has she made against Prince Andrew, Jeffrey Epstein and his '''friends'''?) a lot of the stories seem to be - "he invited me to his posh island, gave me some drinks and then had sex with me, I felt used and trapped...."

    Not saying there is nothing sinister going on at all but....

    Leave a comment:


  • Zigenare
    replied
    Originally posted by TwoWolves View Post
    There is but until there is a trial, evidence presented and testimony delivered we cannot say which for sure. I wonder what is taking the authorities so long?
    Could it be that all the "evidence" is circumstantial? Or even non-extant?

    Leave a comment:


  • GJABS
    replied
    HRH - as in "High Risk Hebephile"?

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by TwoWolves View Post
    I wonder what is taking the authorities so long?
    Because they are the guilty ones?

    Leave a comment:


  • TwoWolves
    replied
    Originally posted by original PM View Post
    Coerced or Forced?

    There is a difference.
    There is but until there is a trial, evidence presented and testimony delivered we cannot say which for sure. I wonder what is taking the authorities so long?

    Leave a comment:


  • original PM
    replied
    Originally posted by TwoWolves View Post
    Epstein was operating an international extortion racket, just because he's dead doesn't mean it's been wrapped up. Does it look like it has?

    These young women were coerced into sleeping with hundreds of men yet we are hearing of only one - why do you think that is?
    Coerced or Forced?

    There is a difference.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    I think he should carry on his duties. Far better for the public to know where he is at all times.....
    We have something for that already. It's called 'prison'...

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    Rather than being sad and cross that I am more clever and educated than you, you should focus your energies into self-improvement.
    Too late, I'm already potty-trained...

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    I think he should carry on his duties. Far better for the public to know where he is at all times.....

    Leave a comment:


  • TwoWolves
    replied
    Epstein was operating an international extortion racket, just because he's dead doesn't mean it's been wrapped up. Does it look like it has?

    These young women were coerced into sleeping with hundreds of men yet we are hearing of only one - why do you think that is?

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by Mordac View Post
    Every family has someone who's a bit of a knobhead. The rest of your family already know that, though...
    I have to strongly disagree. OG's family think they have a HUGE knobhead.....

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by saptastic View Post
    being a carer for his dad indoors.
    Sorry but his father is dead. Same day as the 9/11 attacks.

    I am sure Charles/Anne will care for their father.....

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by Mordac View Post
    Every family has someone who's a bit of a knobhead. The rest of your family already know that, though...
    Rather than being sad and cross that I am more clever and educated than you, you should focus your energies into self-improvement.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    The point of monarchy is that royals are royals by virtue of their birth, regardless of their merits or otherwise. So if you end up with a nonce royal, tough titty. Doff your cap like a loyal subject.
    Every family has someone who's a bit of a knobhead. The rest of your family already know that, though...

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by saptastic View Post
    'Prince Andrew's accuser to twist the knife: BBC Panorama interview with Jeffrey Epstein's 'sex slave' Virginia Roberts WILL be broadcast on December 2'

    Is there a lot more still to come out?

    Take a step back and it is truly amazing how he has fallen from grace - travelling the world at the taxpayers expense to now being a carer for his dad indoors.
    The point of monarchy is that royals are royals by virtue of their birth, regardless of their merits or otherwise. So if you end up with a nonce royal, tough titty. Doff your cap like a loyal subject.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X