• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Special Relationship"

Collapse

  • Zigenare
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    To be fair to the Yanks, in the 1930s the RAF was larger than the USAF, and the Royal Navy was vastly larger than the US Navy.

    But the tables have long since been turned, and these days we're the ones with the almost empty words.

    From Royal Navy - Wikipedia
    In the 1930s there wasn't a USAF so that wasn't exactly difficult, was it?

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by Neville "Peace In Our Time" Chamberlain

    It is always best and safest to count on nothing from the Americans but words
    To be fair to the Yanks, in the 1930s the RAF was larger than the USAF, and the Royal Navy was vastly larger than the US Navy.

    But the tables have long since been turned, and these days we're the ones with the almost empty words.

    From Royal Navy - Wikipedia

    At the start of World War II in 1939, the Royal Navy was the largest in the world, with over 1,400 vessels, including:

    * 7 aircraft carriers – with 5 more under construction
    * 15 battleships and battlecruisers – with 5 more under construction
    * 66 cruisers – with 23 more under construction
    * 184 destroyers – with 52 under construction
    * 45 escort and patrol vessels – with 9 under construction and one on order
    * 60 submarines – with 9 under construction

    Leave a comment:


  • DoctorStrangelove
    replied
    And we can thank the genii in power since 2010 for much of that cheese paring.

    Just encountered something that Chamberlain said:

    Originally posted by Neville "Peace In Our Time" Chamberlain
    It is always best and safest to count on nothing from the Americans but words
    I like this one too:

    Originally posted by WSC
    You can always count on Americans to do the right thing - after they've tried everything else
    Last edited by DoctorStrangelove; 23 July 2019, 14:28.

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    A picture:

    Leave a comment:


  • PhiltheGreek
    replied
    Convoys - that worked before. A couple of Type 26's ought to be able to cover a dozen tankers and knock seven shades out of anything those camel botherers can dream up. Job done.

    Leave a comment:


  • DoctorStrangelove
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    Bear in mind the UK has been whittling away at its armed forces for years now. For example, I think the Navy is only around a quarter the size it was even 20 years ago, and the army and air force is probablyl much the same.

    So this is the US's tough way of reminding us we can't go on assuming that every foreign power will be nice to us and reasonable in this rational and civilized post-modern era. Instead they will inevitably start taking liberties as soon as they sense any weakness, just as they have since the dawn of history.
    What?

    We're not a superpower any more?

    Gad, it'll frighten the horses.

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by DoctorStrangelove View Post
    Yup.

    The "Special Relationship" doesn't look so special now.

    Good to know they're such reliable allies.
    Bear in mind the UK has been whittling away at its armed forces for years now. For example, I think the Navy is only around a quarter the size it was even 20 years ago, and the army and air force is probablyl much the same.

    So this is the US's tough way of reminding us we can't go on assuming that every foreign power will be nice to us and reasonable in this rational and civilized post-modern era. Instead they will inevitably start taking liberties as soon as they sense any weakness, just as they have since the dawn of history.

    Leave a comment:


  • Zigenare
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    I thought this thread was going to be about you and that special squirrel you met recently?
    That relationship faltered somewhat when Alexei announced that he was paying for pussy!

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    I thought this thread was going to be about you and that special squirrel you met recently?
    She wouldn't sign the pre-nut.

    Leave a comment:


  • DoctorStrangelove
    replied
    Yup.

    The "Special Relationship" doesn't look so special now.

    Good to know they're such reliable allies.

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    I thought this thread was going to be about you and that special squirrel you met recently?

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    started a topic Special Relationship

    Special Relationship

    UK must look after its own ships in the Gulf, says Pompeo

    US secretary of state’s comment reflects tensions with UK over Iran nuclear deal

    UK must look after its own ships in the Gulf, says Pompeo | World news | The Guardian

Working...
X