Reply to: Is liberalism obsolete?

[Bean]

What's your gut feeling on that one?

Just found it funny and peculiar, that he directly asked me two questions and then responds like he does, when I post the answers...

still I guess it's par for the course with that level of special

[Zigenare]

You asked the question.

Should I have ignored you instead?

What's your gut feeling on that one?

[WTFH]

Because it looks like a thinly veiled ad-hominem attack,... but you don't do that

Thanks

[Bean]

Comments do not need to be "aimed at" anyone.

You know, sometimes it's possible to play the ball, not the man. It's possible to debate and discuss ideas without attacking individuals.

...but sometimes responses perfectly illustrate the point being made, eh?

What 'ball' did you play exactly with the following post;

Is school out for summer?
The youth wing of the National Farage/Neil Front/Nigel Fromage fan club been let out again.

Or were you not referring to your own post and/or you were just philosophising in general?
(Because it looks like a thinly veiled ad-hominem attack, with no idea discussion/debate whatsoever...so it may be possible, but you don't do that)

[Bean]

Thanks for sharing your feelings.

You asked the question.

Should I have ignored you instead?

[Old Greg]

Bless. My point is that, usually, anyone disagreeing with e.g. the transgender lobby is called a fascist and/or Nazi. However, you are correct that, this doesn't equate to someone disagreeing with anything someone else says. There are a few topics this happens with (and mainly in the USA): Trump, Wage gap, transgenderism.


I understood it, but just don't feel you're being genuine, hence my repeating. i.e. Why did you make post #58 at all, if you completely understood my answer in post #57, which had already answered the question to both post #56 & #58 ?

Perhaps you agreed with misunderstanding my post, but disagreed with being labelled special?

Perhaps it was the duplicate posting forum bug?

Perhaps it's simply a case of an older person repeating themselves?

Thanks for sharing your feelings.

[Bean]

Good boy, Bean. But what was the point in posting evidence that some people call some people Nazis, as an attempt to rebut my point?

Did you not understand my last answer? I kept it simple for you.

Bless. My point is that, usually, anyone disagreeing with e.g. the transgender lobby is called a fascist and/or Nazi. However, you are correct that, this doesn't equate to someone disagreeing with anything someone else says. There are a few topics this happens with (and mainly in the USA): Trump, Wage gap, transgenderism.


I understood it, but just don't feel you're being genuine, hence my repeating. i.e. Why did you make post #58 at all, if you completely understood my answer in post #57, which had already answered the question to both post #56 & #58 ?

Perhaps you agreed with misunderstanding my post, but disagreed with being labelled special?

Perhaps it was the duplicate posting forum bug?

Perhaps it's simply a case of an older person repeating themselves?

[Old Greg]

Portland Antifa are the real fascists | Spectator USA

Interesting read...

Fascism is considerably broader than thuggishness and attacking journalists, bad as those things are. Regrettably the article doesn't address this and just...

...calls them fascists! Who'd have thunk it??

[original PM]

Portland Antifa are the real fascists | Spectator USA

Interesting read...

[Zigenare]

Ok let's debate and discuss the idea of "the youth wing of the National Farage/Neil Front/Nigel Fromage fan club"

What's your position on this 'idea'?

You've not quite sussed how things work on here, have you?

[Jog On]

Comments do not need to be "aimed at" anyone.

You know, sometimes it's possible to play the ball, not the man. It's possible to debate and discuss ideas without attacking individuals.

...but sometimes responses perfectly illustrate the point being made, eh?

Ok let's debate and discuss the idea of "the youth wing of the National Farage/Neil Front/Nigel Fromage fan club"

What's your position on this 'idea'?

[WTFH]

Who was your comment aimed at? The "name" being:

Comments do not need to be "aimed at" anyone.

You know, sometimes it's possible to play the ball, not the man. It's possible to debate and discuss ideas without attacking individuals.

...but sometimes responses perfectly illustrate the point being made, eh?

[Jog On]

Who exactly did I call a "name" in that post?

In that post I've not said any particular person on this thread is disabled mentally or physically, I've not quoted/misquoted or quoted out of context.

Who was your comment aimed at? The "name" being:

youth wing of the National Farage/Neil Front/Nigel Fromage fan club

[WTFH]

Is school out for summer?

The youth wing of the National Farage/Neil Front/Nigel Fromage fan club been let out again.

Ooh ooh - name calling! What perfect timing to illustrate the point being made.

Who exactly did I call a "name" in that post?

In that post I've not said any particular person on this thread is disabled mentally or physically, I've not quoted/misquoted or quoted out of context.

[Old Greg]

I'll be running for office at this rate...

With the current competition, I may vote for you.