• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Fake News or Freedom of Speech?"

Collapse

  • greenlake
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    A fake Nancy Pelosi


    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    A fake Nancy Pelosi video allegedly made by a wife-beater. The question being asked is whether the video was fake news or should be permitted under Freedom of Speech. HTH.
    Thanks. So I was right then.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    What's this irrelevant boring tripe about?
    A fake Nancy Pelosi video allegedly made by a wife-beater. The question being asked is whether the video was fake news or should be permitted under Freedom of Speech. HTH.

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    What's this irrelevant boring tripe about?

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    “Facebook responded by demoting the video’s ranking so severely it became all but unfindable on the platform, and surrounded the clip with conspicuous links to fact-checks debunking its authenticity. But the plattform refuses to remove the video, despite harsh words from critics, including Pelosi. “I think they have proven —by not taking down something they know is false—that they were willing enablers of the Russian interference in our election,” Pelosi said in a radio interview Wednesday.”

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    “Court records show that In February 2018 he was written up for a probation violation, and a California judge issued a warrant for his arrest. A spokesperson for the Riverside County Sheriff's Department confirmed the warrant is still outstanding.”

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    started a topic Fake News or Freedom of Speech?

    Fake News or Freedom of Speech?

    “Brooks, a 34-year-old day laborer currently on probation after pleading guilty to domestic battery, claims that his “drunk” commentary on an unaltered Pelosi video had no connection to the now-infamous fake clip that premiered less than 15 minutes later. “I wasn't the individual who created that Pelosi video,” he insisted in a telephone interview.”

    “In the first hint at a possible motive for the Pelosi smear, Brooks volunteered that the video brought in nearly $1,000 in shared ad revenue.

    That number would have been higher, he said, except that Facebook cut off any future earnings when the company’s fact-check partners ruled the clip a hoax about 36 hours after its Politics WatchDog debut. “It makes money for Facebook too,” he groused. “I'm sure that's their motive for not taking it down."

    We Found Shawn Brooks, the Guy Behind the Viral ‘Drunk Pelosi’ Video

Working...
X