• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Petition against Car travel Tax!"

Collapse

  • PAG
    replied
    Public transport is damn expensive .. sometimes car works out cheaper !

    Leave a comment:


  • Lucy
    replied
    Originally posted by rootsnall
    It would take years of hard decisons and consistent policies to start sorting out the traffic problems and our system doesn't work that way. Our politicians only look a year ahead at most !

    And silly English people put up with it.

    The tube should be at least £6 in the mornings. Get the shoppers, tourists, grannys to come in later.

    Sorted.

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    If everyone moves to London, we don't need cars, we can all hop on the tube. Sorteeeeed.

    Leave a comment:


  • rootsnall
    replied
    Originally posted by wendigo100
    I accept that, but the rush hour is now already three hours at each end of the day.

    I believe this scheme will end in chaos. People trying new routes, which get gridlocked so the charges for those routes are bumped up, so people crowd onto other routes, then back to the original routes, etc, ad infinitum. At least people currently know what to expect everywhere.

    I suggest HMG bite the bullet and look at the cause rather than put more sticking plasters over the symptoms. Suppose they did something to stabilize the number of road users (and not by taxing some out of existence to make room for the increases)? Then, if they build a few more trunk roads to relieve the existing pressures, those roads won't fill up within a year or two.

    Taking a holistic view, the same solution could apply to the housing shortage too.
    It would take years of hard decisons and consistent policies to start sorting out the traffic problems and our system doesn't work that way. Our politicians only look a year ahead at most !

    Leave a comment:


  • expat
    replied
    Originally posted by TazMaN
    Ken puts up tube/train prices, oil companies and government force up the cost of driving -- so what are we supposed to do, walk?
    No Mr Bond, I expect you to pay!

    Leave a comment:


  • wendigo100
    replied
    Originally posted by rootsnall
    I'm not saying its the perfect solution especially with crap or non existent public transport but what else do you suggest. The theory is it'll spread the traffic out over a longer period by making some people go earlier or later or in some cases some people just won't make the journey at all.
    I accept that, but the rush hour is now already three hours at each end of the day.

    I believe this scheme will end in chaos. People trying new routes, which get gridlocked so the charges for those routes are bumped up, so people crowd onto other routes, then back to the original routes, etc, ad infinitum. At least people currently know what to expect everywhere.

    I suggest HMG bite the bullet and look at the cause rather than put more sticking plasters over the symptoms. Suppose they did something to stabilize the number of road users (and not by taxing some out of existence to make room for the increases)? Then, if they build a few more trunk roads to relieve the existing pressures, those roads won't fill up within a year or two.

    Taking a holistic view, the same solution could apply to the housing shortage too.

    Leave a comment:


  • rootsnall
    replied
    Originally posted by wendigo100
    How is it going to do that? People still need to travel to work. If you price them off the M25 they'll clog up the minor roads.
    I'm not saying its the perfect solution especially with crap or non existent public transport but what else do you suggest. The theory is it'll spread the traffic out over a longer period by making some people go earlier or later or in some cases some people just won't make the journey at all.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lucy
    replied
    Originally posted by gingerjedi

    When’s the next general election? Some of my mates who have been staunch red lefties in the past are telling me they are going to vote Tory next time around. NL.
    Red (eeek !) or Blue makes no difference, the Tories want it too.

    Leave a comment:


  • wendigo100
    replied
    Originally posted by rootsnall
    Its also the only way to possibly free up roads in peak hours in the absence of any joined up planning by the so called government.
    How is it going to do that? People still need to travel to work. If you price them off the M25 they'll clog up the minor roads.

    Leave a comment:


  • gingerjedi
    replied
    Originally posted by Bagpuss
    That may be so, but the Tories want it too. Vote 'none of the above'
    But cameron smokez dope so eez dan wit da kidz init

    Leave a comment:


  • Bagpuss
    replied
    Originally posted by gingerjedi
    And what was NL's response to a petition with over 1,250,000 signatures on it "uh... whatever... the public are stupid... we'll go ahead anyway" feckeing arrogant bastards, Its not that we don't recognise that there's a problem its just that we are sick the standard NL 'solution' of sticking yet another tax on us.

    When’s the next general election? Some of my mates who have been staunch red lefties in the past are telling me they are going to vote Tory next time around. NL.
    That may be so, but the Tories want it too. Vote 'none of the above'

    Leave a comment:


  • gingerjedi
    replied
    And what was NL's response to a petition with over 1,250,000 signatures on it "uh... whatever... the public are stupid... we'll go ahead anyway" feckeing arrogant bastards, Its not that we don't recognise that there's a problem its just that we are sick the standard NL 'solution' of sticking yet another tax on us.

    When’s the next general election? Some of my mates who have been staunch red lefties in the past are telling me they are going to vote Tory next time around. NL.

    Leave a comment:


  • rootsnall
    replied
    Originally posted by Lucy
    Road pricing is here to stay, sign as many petitions as you like.
    I agree. Its also the only way to possibly free up roads in peak hours in the absence of any joined up planning by the so called government. Once we started building out of town offices and industrial units without any attempt at providing public transport to them we were stuffed.

    Leave a comment:


  • ChimpMaster
    replied
    It was even on the news the other night - as in how many people had signed up to it etc.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lucy
    replied
    Road pricing is here to stay, sign as many petitions as you like.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X