• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Measuring Socio-economic Background In Your Workforce: Recommended Measures For Use B"

Collapse

  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by original PM View Post
    Just a picture of socialism at work......

    ewww, sloppy 2000ths?

    Leave a comment:


  • original PM
    replied
    Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post
    This would be greatly simplified after a few years of Corbyn.

    "We don't have any jobs, but if we did, how would you describe your socio-economic background?"

    "Dirt poor."

    Still, we could all be dirty poor together, which is nice.
    Just a picture of socialism at work......

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post
    This would be greatly simplified after a few years of Corbyn.

    "We don't have any jobs, but if we did, how would you describe your socio-economic background?"

    "Dirt poor."

    Still, we could all be dirty poor together, which is nice.
    Project Fear. Tut tut tut.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    I suspect means testing probably costs more than the meals themselves.

    If Universal credit costs £600 per application deity knows how much it costs to decide how many 47p meals people should have. If it were £200 a year to supply meals then it makes sense to just make them free.

    Leave a comment:


  • jamesbrown
    replied
    This would be greatly simplified after a few years of Corbyn.

    "We don't have any jobs, but if we did, how would you describe your socio-economic background?"

    "Dirt poor."

    Still, we could all be dirty poor together, which is nice.

    Leave a comment:


  • Measuring Socio-economic Background In Your Workforce: Recommended Measures For Use B

    Measuring Socio-economic Background In Your Workforce: Recommended Measures For Use By Employers

    https://www.gov.uk/government/public...background-seb

    https://assets.publishing.service.go..._employers.pdf

    https://welfareweekly.com/tory-plans...fare+Weekly%29

    Currently only recommendations and for the civil service but with the current government, who knows...class war...

    Employers are to be encouraged to ask potential employees about where they fit in UK society and whether they see themselves as economically disadvantaged, under new plans that are likely to reignite concerns of a Tory class war.

    Job applicants would face four multiple-choice questions under plans due to be rolled out in the civil service later this year, with questions including what school a worker or job applicant attended and whether they were in receipt of free school meals.

    The Government claim the collected data will help to make workplaces for diverse and socially inclusive, but critics may argue the plans have ulterior motives and could see workers asked to divulge potentially sensitive information about their background.

Working...
X