• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "The UN - What a waste of time!"

Collapse

  • Mailman
    replied
    The evil little f8ckers!

    Mailman

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by Mailman
    Alfred also posts on libertyforum.org! The forum where he feels most at home

    But what they dont realise is that its the eskimo's everyone should be afraid of. Them and the pengiuns! Their eyes are too close together and they smell of cabbages!

    Mailman
    The question of course is not "why are there no penguins in the arctic", it is rather more sinister I'm afraid, the question is "why are there no polar bears in the antarctic?" The penguins have eaten them all!!!!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Mailman
    replied
    Alfred also posts on libertyforum.org! The forum where he feels most at home

    But what they dont realise is that its the eskimo's everyone should be afraid of. Them and the pengiuns! Their eyes are too close together and they smell of cabbages!

    Mailman

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    I would mostly close it down and replace it with something along the lines of the employment arbitration service to help sort out problems only between those actually willing to do so. If there is no wilingness by those involved, any imposition from the outside is usually doomed to failure.

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by Churchill
    Have they got any oil?

    And that reveals exactly why Darfur raises such little concern.

    Alf and Churchill cannot make their snide remarks against the Americans or Blair, as neither can be blamed for the problems in darfur.
    These two are our "feeling guilty, lets give the Americans and Blair a kicking" whipping boys.

    Much the same as why we feel that we can intervene and "do something" about obesity, yet "do nothing" about the breakdown of the family, as Daniel Finklestein argues so eloquently in the Times today.

    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article...500925,00.html

    Leave a comment:


  • AlfredJPruffock
    replied
    Originally posted by Churchill
    A few of us didn't argue at the time AJP!
    Aye Churchill !

    As the Chinese say

    Easier to burn a house than to build one ...

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by AlfredJPruffock
    New World Order anybody ?

    For all the faults of the UN, nothing can surpass the spectacular failure, at every level ,of the Bush-Blair Axis of Aggression as it flounders in the the sands of the Middle East.

    Didnt Galloway mention Iraq would be a quagmire ... he did recieve a lot of derision for saying that at the time - but now - who would dare argue with that ?
    A few of us didn't argue at the time AJP!

    Leave a comment:


  • AlfredJPruffock
    replied
    Originally posted by bogeyman
    I suppose you want Bush and his "rapturites" to be the one world government then you sad twat.

    OMG! We're left behind! Oooooh, wish I'da praised JESUS a bit more.

    Twat!

    p.s. MODS: can we have a JESUS BANANA emoticon - would be so useful in replying to Chico's posts.
    New World Order anybody ?

    For all the faults of the UN, nothing can surpass the spectacular failure, at every level ,of the Bush-Blair Axis of Aggression as it flounders in the the sands of the Middle East.

    Didnt Galloway mention Iraq would be a quagmire ... he did recieve a lot of derision for saying that at the time - but now - who would dare argue with that ?

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by Chico
    The UN - first step in the one world government?
    Yeah, it's run by the Freemasons!
    (Tongue in cheek, it's the giant alien lizards what's in charge!)

    Leave a comment:


  • bogeyman
    replied
    Originally posted by Chico
    The UN - first step in the one world government?
    I suppose you want Bush and his "rapturites" to be the one world government then you sad twat.

    OMG! We're left behind! Oooooh, wish I'da praised JESUS a bit more.

    Twat!

    p.s. MODS: can we have a JESUS BANANA emoticon - would be so useful in replying to Chico's posts.

    Leave a comment:


  • Troll
    replied
    Originally posted by Not So Wise
    Problem with the UN is it not really independent and also powerless if the big boys don't want to play ball. And even when they do, as they all want something slightly different it normally ends up hamstringing itself trying to keep them all happy

    Untill it has the power to punish even it's veto members it is a waste of space
    Shall we try the league of nations model again?

    Why should the weak be able to punish the powerful?

    Leave a comment:


  • Not So Wise
    replied
    Problem with the UN is it not really independent and also powerless if the big boys don't want to play ball. And even when they do, as they all want something slightly different it normally ends up hamstringing itself trying to keep them all happy

    Untill it has the power to punish even it's veto members it is a waste of space

    Leave a comment:


  • Dundeegeorge
    replied
    Tsk tsk, why would you expect the UN to intervene

    in Darfur?
    There aren't any pretty boys or girls there, are there?
    I'll Get My Mac

    Leave a comment:


  • Troll
    replied
    It will all be whiteys fault in the end

    Leave a comment:


  • wobbegong
    replied
    Originally posted by Chico
    The UN - first step in the one world government?
    Not really, even a joke of a government like Tony's can arrive at a decision once in a while, granted, it's invariably the wrong one but at least they get there. The UN is just a gravy train.
    Last edited by wobbegong; 12 December 2006, 15:24. Reason: spelling

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X