Originally posted by Lockhouse
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Oh dear...
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Oh dear..."
Collapse
-
I recall these conversations. While we were fighting for our lives through the "great recession", some of us barely recovered from the Dot Com crash they were swanning around without a care in the world, effectively government permies.
-
That was the point I was trying to make, and has been said on here many times, don't rely on your accountant for IR35 matters.
I still hear contractors saying "I let my accountant look after all that stuff."
qh
Leave a comment:
-
At least 10 years ago on the old PCG forums people were making exactly this point about the BBC presenters - "Why haven't they been chased?", "it's only the little guy that gets his collar felt" etc etc. We thought it was blatantly unfair at the time and wondered how they were getting away with it.
I have absolutely no sympathy for them and as we're told so often by the Powers That Be - "Ignorance is no excuse". They need to grow a pair or pay up, not go around blaming everyone but themselves like spoilt children.
Leave a comment:
-
'Their accountants should have been advising them on the implication of IR35'
Accountants will have been employed to reduce the clients tax liabilities as much as possible so they can charge a higher fee.
It is not up to the accountant to ensure their client is working in a specific manner to avoid specific rules and regulations.
The truth is all involved will have known the risks they simple felt they were too 'important' to abide by them.
No sympathy.
Leave a comment:
-
-
That seems a fair point TBH.Originally posted by BBCTheir accountants should have been advising them on the implication of IR35.
Leave a comment:
-
Oh dear...
The Beeb blames accountants
Did they not get in QDOS? (Other contract checking companies are available)
Whoops!But in a new stance against limited company accountants, the BBC spokesman also told the Sunday Telegraph: “Individuals with a PSC usually engage an accountant to file accounts. Their accountants should have been advising them on the implication of IR35.”
qhTags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Luke’s Story: “I knew it was a loan. But they changed the rules.” Today 00:00
- I registered my company with my home address. Whoops. Here's what Companies House shows the world about you Yesterday 13:06
- The Tories’ three IR35 replacement options — but contractors are right to be sceptical Yesterday 03:51
- Conservatives to replace IR35 outright, Griffith vows — advisers who met him reveal what it should contain Sep 21 05:06
- HMRC’s tax calculation errors: why contractors must check their bill now Sep 17 05:14
- HMRC names 12 loan charge-type schemes, one with ‘Tardis’ clause Sep 15 00:12
- Inside IR35 contractors as zero-hours reform victims is why Kate Dearden must meet us Sep 14 06:37
- Simple Assessment letters: How ex-Personal Service Companies are on HMRC’s radar Sep 11 12:16
- HMRC leaves 37,000 contractors’ nil-liability question in the air Sep 11 07:42
- Pay 2% to protect a ‘loan’. Settle it for 1–2%? The contractor debt mystery deepens Sep 10 06:30

Leave a comment: