• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Corrupt UK - Money Laundering, Persons of Significant Control, blah blah"

Collapse

  • vetran
    replied
    great so we can fine them then confiscate their assets!

    Leave a comment:


  • Corrupt UK - Money Laundering, Persons of Significant Control, blah blah

    https://www.bbc.com/news/amp/uk-42950097

    At least £1.2bn has been funnelled through companies registered at the same Potters Bar address.
    The vast majority of the 100-plus companies the BBC looked at, list their officers or members as other companies, registered in secrecy jurisdictions like the Seychelles or Belize.

    But since June 2016, UK companies have been required to list a "person with significant control", or PSC. This is supposed to reveal the real people truly in control of firms.

    In an exclusive analysis for File on 4, the anti-corruption organisation Global Witness has revealed that nearly one in 10 UK companies - 350,000 - still haven't named a PSC with the UK registry, Companies House.

    While there are some legitimate circumstances for not listing a PSC, Murray Worthy, senior campaigner at Global Witness, says he's "shocked" by the "worryingly large number" that haven't, and that others are submitting data "that's just clearly inaccurate".

    He cites PSCs aged over 300 or supposedly born in the future.

    The analysis found another 7,000 companies declaring that they are controlled by companies registered in secrecy jurisdictions.
    Doing what we've always done best, helping baddies retain their billions for a kick-back...

Working...
X