• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Cutting down the number of jobless"

Collapse

  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by woohoo View Post
    Most of it makes sense and I imagine the frustration felt by him came out when he said for once perhaps police brutality should be allowed.

    When the riots spread to Manchester and people would not travel to the city centre or I was afraid for the wife getting back to her car then believe me I would have been happy if they used rubber bullets to stop the rioters.
    I believe in the death penalty. If any of my family are murdered. Apart from that no.
    Although I am against policwe brutality, I would accept it against HMRC employees.

    Leave a comment:


  • woohoo
    replied
    Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
    He believes in police brutality as well:



    Most of it makes sense and I imagine the frustration felt by him came out when he said for once perhaps police brutality should be allowed.

    When the riots spread to Manchester and people would not travel to the city centre or I was afraid for the wife getting back to her car then believe me I would have been happy if they used rubber bullets to stop the rioters.

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    He believes in police brutality as well:



    Leave a comment:


  • Soho
    replied
    I think that people get this mentality that even if I am not able to do something, I will sustain myself on the benefits. It's the easy availability I think that is the major problem. If you take the example of Norway, it is considered the best country in the world when it comes to income, quality of life, health, overall happiness, etc.
    And why is that?
    One of the contributors to Norway’s high quality of life is its commitment to generous public spending; Norway spends almost 10% of its GDP on healthcare, and this differs to many other countries as the vast majority of its spending is on public rather than private healthcare. The US, by comparison, spends nearly 17% of GDP on healthcare with around half on private costs. Even with current spending levels, Norway’s ageing demographic and commitment to high spending on public healthcare require economic planning for the future. For example, existing equipment in Norwegian hospitals requires upgrading urgently, at an estimated cost of $600million.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by WTFH View Post
    I hadn't read that one.
    Is the plan to bring back corporal punishment, then update it to capital punishment?
    Only for cyclists....

    Leave a comment:


  • MattZani
    replied
    Originally posted by HugeWhale View Post
    Why confine this to homo sapiens? Why not have every animal of every species pass such a test?
    Animals have their own ways to make sure there is continuation of species. They've done it for longer than us and are still here (despite us screwing eveything up as usual)

    Leave a comment:


  • original PM
    replied
    Originally posted by woohoo View Post
    The last I heard a green party member speak they wanted to encourage people to work in the fields, back to nature. We had this question a little while back and the industrial revolution won.
    Indeed - in fact if we move back to this the green party are actually dooming the human race.

    The sun will go red giant in the next 4.5 billion years if we have not found a suitable alternative to living somewhere but earth the human race will be wiped out then.

    And that assumes we do not get wiped out by a big rock from space, our own stupidity or galactic alien lizards who find human meat a delicacy..prior to that.

    Leave a comment:


  • The_Equalizer
    replied
    Originally posted by WTFH View Post
    Sorry, I wasn't around when the Industrial Revolution started. Was that when we had all the smog?
    That and the 1950s.

    Leave a comment:


  • WTFH
    replied
    Originally posted by woohoo View Post
    The last I heard a green party member speak they wanted to encourage people to work in the fields, back to nature. We had this question a little while back and the industrial revolution won.
    Sorry, I wasn't around when the Industrial Revolution started. Was that when we had all the smog?

    Leave a comment:


  • woohoo
    replied
    Originally posted by WTFH View Post
    I hadn't read that one.
    Is the plan to bring back corporal punishment, then update it to capital punishment?
    The last I heard a green party member speak they wanted to encourage people to work in the fields, back to nature. We had this question a little while back and the industrial revolution won.

    Leave a comment:


  • WTFH
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Personally I quite like the green party proposal of cutting the UK population down to 40million by education - what they believe is the environmentally sustainable population.
    I hadn't read that one.
    Is the plan to bring back corporal punishment, then update it to capital punishment?

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by WTFH View Post
    Financially better off as individuals, yes, and better for the environment. The earth's resources are overstretched, and the current solution of cutting down trees/killing animals to allow humans to make more money is not in the best interests of the planet or its inhabitants.
    Personally I quite like the green party proposal of cutting the UK population down to 40million by education - what they believe is the environmentally sustainable population.

    No doubt if they actually got into power they would just do the same as every other government. With a green spin.

    Animal Farm 2.....

    Leave a comment:


  • WTFH
    replied
    Originally posted by MattZani View Post
    Benefit claimants/low IQ folks are the biggest tory voters. Can't say anything bad about your own electorate.
    If you count a pension as being a benefit...


    Originally posted by MattZani View Post
    I think only people with a certain IQ and income level should be allowed to procreate. Thing is a lot of these people are smart enough to know they're better off without offsprings.
    Financially better off as individuals, yes, and better for the environment. The earth's resources are overstretched, and the current solution of cutting down trees/killing animals to allow humans to make more money is not in the best interests of the planet or its inhabitants.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by HugeWhale View Post
    Why confine this to homo sapiens? Why not have every animal of every species pass such a test?
    It generally does happen. Indeed with humans it used to be that way until about 100 years ago.

    These days it seems to be survival of the fattest rather than survival of the fittest.....

    Leave a comment:


  • HugeWhale
    replied
    Originally posted by MattZani View Post
    Of course he has apologised.

    Benefit claimants/low IQ folks are the biggest tory voters. Can't say anything bad about your own electorate.


    Kidding aside, I think only people with a certain IQ and income level should be allowed to procreate. Thing is a lot of these people are smart enough to know they're better off without offsprings.
    Why confine this to homo sapiens? Why not have every animal of every species pass such a test?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X