• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Tragic, tragic, sad news. Sit down before reading this."

Collapse

  • Mordac
    replied
    Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
    According to Dacre, The Daily Mail, The Mail On Sunday and Mail Online are all separate entities
    They almost certainly are separate entities, but that would only be for tax reasons...

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    Thankfully I was using the chaise longue, otherwise I'd have put my back out.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    Strange, I'm sure I read not long ago that the Mail Online was doing pretty well compared with some of the others such as the Telegraph, Guardian, and Independent, all of which have been haemo, er, hemora, um, losing money hand over foot at a massive rate.

    The Mail Online would be so much better if one could include filters, such as:

    dailymail.co.uk?no-harry&no-sport&definitely-no-bloody-wayne-rooney etc etc
    you missed the &Meghan%20Tits%20out%20for%20Lads


    Indeed its a successful British brand.

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    Strange, I'm sure I read not long ago that the Mail Online was doing pretty well compared with some of the others such as the Telegraph, Guardian, and Independent, all of which have been haemo, er, hemora, um, losing money hand over foot at a massive rate.

    The Mail Online would be so much better if one could include filters, such as:

    dailymail.co.uk?no-harry&no-sport&definitely-no-bloody-wayne-rooney etc etc
    According to Dacre, The Daily Mail, The Mail On Sunday and Mail Online are all separate entities

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    DMGT’s chief executive, Paul Zwillenberg, highlighted Mail Online’s move into profit in the final quarter and the launch of new initiatives such as DailyMailTV in the US. Mail Online is also expected to make an operating profit over the coming year.
    What is he? A bleedin foreigner? I'm bleedin outraged!

    Leave a comment:


  • MrMarkyMark
    replied
    FTFY

    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post

    The Mail Online would be so much better if it disappeared entirely.

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Strange, I'm sure I read not long ago that the Mail Online was doing pretty well compared with some of the others such as the Telegraph, Guardian, and Independent, all of which have been haemo, er, hemora, um, losing money hand over foot at a massive rate.

    The Mail Online would be so much better if one could include filters, such as:

    dailymail.co.uk?no-harry&no-sport&definitely-no-bloody-wayne-rooney etc etc
    Last edited by OwlHoot; 30 November 2017, 19:18.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Fake News!

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    started a topic Tragic, tragic, sad news. Sit down before reading this.

    Tragic, tragic, sad news. Sit down before reading this.

    https://www.theguardian.com/business...-five-year-low

Working...
X