• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: CALEDONIA

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "CALEDONIA"

Collapse

  • Bean
    replied
    Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
    Yes you are.
    You are wrong



    Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
    I'm a messenger nothing more.
    Oh?

    To whom did the subjective opinion of the B&B hosts belong?

    To whom belongs the 'definitive explanation of reasoning behind the result' ?

    To whom was this true of - "It really did enforce..." ?

    Go on....this should be fun.

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    Originally posted by Bean View Post
    Firstly, no i'm not a sock-puppet.
    Yes you are.

    Originally posted by Bean View Post
    Secondly, fishermen/women have genuine concerns - you appear to have swept them under the rug. It does also appear from your post, that you're labelling your B&B hosts as ill-informed purely due to fishing rights. A tad assumptive/arrogant/uncaring..
    I'm a messenger nothing more.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bean
    replied
    Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
    Assguru you're such a twerp.

    It is one example not a definitive explanation of reasoning behind the result.
    Firstly, no i'm not a sock-puppet.

    Secondly, fishermen/women have genuine concerns - you appear to have swept them under the rug. It does also appear from your post, that you're labelling your B&B hosts as ill-informed purely due to fishing rights. A tad assumptive/arrogant/uncaring.

    Finally, there are no nationwide surveys that have interviewed more than ~2k-50k people (AFAIK, please link me otherwise) - so there is no truly credible explanation possible for anyone to make, other than an extrapolation, based upon a small selection survey - in which, the questions asked can also be biased.

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    Originally posted by Bean View Post
    So by using 1 small business as anecdotal evidence (even though many fishing people have genuine concerns), you extrapolated your subjective judgement (that they were ill-informed) to an entire ~52% of people that voted leave?


    genius
    Assguru you're such a twerp.

    It is one example not a definitive explanation of reasoning behind the result.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bean
    replied
    Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
    We drove through Skye last year ourselves (in German plates no less - Servus! Said the other German at the petrol station - not German!) - single track roads were indeed overcrowded, but mostly from abroad, not other Brits.

    A number of roads were developed in places. 'EU initiative award something or other' for this new section of nice wide A class road. A little later the B&B hosts we stayed at were Brexit voters, fishing rights were what pushed them to leavers. But they acknowledged the only development of the roads locally were funded from the EU. There was no fish on the menu. It really did enforce how ill informed people were leading up to the referendum.
    So by using 1 small business as anecdotal evidence (even though many fishing people have genuine concerns), you extrapolated your subjective judgement (that they were ill-informed) to an entire ~52% of people that voted leave?


    genius

    Leave a comment:


  • NigelJK
    replied
    Right, so one (crofters) road at the cost of £2.5M vs the rest of the island which was finished years ahead and without the 'financial problems'. Oddly they didn't report that?

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    Originally posted by NigelJK View Post
    It's even got it own Tescos now, should improve matters no end. The roads were done 5+ years ago, after the bridge was put in. All HA money IIRC. The EU roads are the single track with passing places that the locals use to avoid the main roads.
    Apparently not.

    Scenic Isle of Skye road upgrade completed - BBC News

    Leave a comment:


  • NigelJK
    replied
    It's even got it own Tescos now, should improve matters no end. The roads were done 5+ years ago, after the bridge was put in. All HA money IIRC. The EU roads are the single track with passing places that the locals use to avoid the main roads.

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
    they acknowledged the only development of the roads locally were funded from the EU with money that WE had sent there.
    ftfy

    Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
    It really did in-force how ill informed people were leading up to the referendum.
    QED

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    Originally posted by barrydidit View Post
    We drove through Skye last year ourselves (in German plates no less - Servus! Said the other German at the petrol station - not German!) - single track roads were indeed overcrowded, but mostly from abroad, not other Brits.

    A number of roads were developed in places. 'EU initiative award something or other' for this new section of nice wide A class road. A little later the B&B hosts we stayed at were Brexit voters, fishing rights were what pushed them to leavers. But they acknowledged the only development of the roads locally were funded from the EU. There was no fish on the menu. It really did enforce how ill informed people were leading up to the referendum.
    Last edited by scooterscot; 1 October 2017, 15:20.

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    Originally posted by BR14 View Post
    aye, - they west coast midges'll make short work o' yer pale embra arse
    Just cause posh tastes sweeter.

    Leave a comment:


  • TestMangler
    replied
    Originally posted by barrydidit View Post
    Looks pretty free to me. What with there being nobody there. I suppose, if the place is littered with those giant granite butt plugs, that's a perfectly reasonable excuse to avoid the place.

    Those Syrian refugees who ended up on Bute were on the One Show on friday night btw. They'd even cleaned up the vomit outside the Esplanade for the occasion, and found a day when it wasn't raining to film them. Must have cost 5000 licence fees worth of overtime to arrange that combination.
    There was no vomit outside the Esplanade when they filmed it. You didn't come up this year, remember ?

    Leave a comment:


  • BR14
    replied
    Originally posted by barrydidit View Post
    aye, - they west coast midges'll make short work o' yer pale embra arse

    Leave a comment:


  • barrydidit
    replied
    Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
    piccy of the cuillins making me home sick now...
    don't go in summer

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...-tourism-surge

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    piccy of the cuillins making me home sick now...

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X